Man, I miss Haley. I think we should start mirroring the original DZK sites. I've put up the only one I had the picture and sound from. I'll leave the rest to the other Haley fans out there.
GAYTMND is NOT an alternate universe, so playing on current fads and YTMND's isn't quite in the fabulous spirit of GAYTMND...Plus, this isn't a paradox.
"Possibly the worst show ever made, Hence it got cancelled. Basically the Simpsons in space."
You do know it is coming back in '08, right?
By the way, the image credit should go to whatever fan made it...it is not legit Futurama art.
40th? And I am clicking on every ad link possible to help the cause Max...plus as I mentioned in the comments to your YTMND: If you want, I'll be more than willing to chip in with some graphic design work.
I have over 30 hours of video which easily shows that nothing you just said happened.
Yes the antenna fell slightly early, because the towers were Hull-Cure Structures. A rare form of construction which would allow separate failures of the inner and outer support columns.
That should be 49.3 % ...and most only agree that the government ignored warning signs...which is an entirely different debate than the one we are in the middle of.
"most New Yorkers believe there is a government cover-up surrounding..." NOPE only 49.3 do...that does not equal a majority...thus it does not amount to "most"
By the way, friction (From bending metal or similar means) alone can build up incredible amounts of heat, enough to melt metal. In the process of failure, plenty of metal would have bent...creating the friction.
Office fires can easily reach 1100 degrees or hotter...which is enough to weaken steel...even structural steel significantly.
I've conducted independent investigations into the speed of the fall, and found that the actual fall time was closer to 15 seconds, nearly double the impossible 8.4 seconds cited in the million dollar challenge.
Video evidence clearly shows the point of failure to be approximately at the point of impact.
Bomb reports can easily be dismissed as vaporized jet fuel combusting in the elevator shafts, which had their hermetic seals broken by the impact of the planes. As I said, your only proof of bombs is hearsay and speculation.
Planes alone would have done that, so would a straight to the point bombing (Like in 1993), or a complete demolition...so why hit the buildings with a plane AND bring them down? If you could have seen the terror on the faces of New Yorkers that day, you would know that the buildings being hit purposely by planes would have been sufficient.
That info on China is all based on what its media allows out of its borders...which is not to be trusted. The Soviet Union looked like it was doing splendidly based on its reports too. Do you remember the Soviet Union, or was it before your time?
I've seen that picture of those supports before, and they were at the base of the tower...far from the point of failure...so now we are getting far into scientific impossibilities.
First you say that taking the buildings down was not the point, now you say that taking down a symbol of America was the point. The buildings by your own admission were a symbol of America...which is it?
Regarding the metal: Most has miniscule fissures which the metal will fail along under extreme strain, like a building falling on top of them...this also heat the metal greatly (Try it by bending a paper clip...it gets hot).
Okay, if we didn't need the buildings demolished, why not just fly planes into them, sans demolition...that should have gotten it's point across, like 7/7/05 did in England.
Wow, are you psychic? Apparently you are. Am I going to have a good year? Am I going to win the lottery? Maybe China should focus on it's own economy before trying to become a super power.
"supports of the buildings were so cleanly cut" not the supports that I saw...care to show otherwise.
And are you suggesting that thermite was used...despite the fact that it has NEVER once been used in a controlled demolition in history? Thermite is highly unreliable, and does not provide the necessary reaction to efficiently take down a building.
Charges are quite distinct...they need to be to take down structures. Look I can link to a video too: http://www.controlled-demolition.com/images/client/kingdome.mpg
foxymcfox's recent comments: