fascistkokomo's recent comments:

September 2nd, 2007
I live in a can on the moon!
September 1st, 2007
MY EYES! ZE GOGGLES DO NOSSING!!!
September 1st, 2007
"You have to answer for Santino, Carlo." In mob-talk, "answer" = get garroted in a car and kick out the winshield as you violently try to avoid epic death.
September 1st, 2007
This site makes me feel old.
September 1st, 2007
Cabin Fever remix?
August 30th, 2007
On on the site ?Two Topless Strippers
(0)
That is a game. And you just fell for the trap!
August 30th, 2007
Hey there Frodo, I know i's hard bein' 3 foot 4, with yo little *ss so close to the flo'.
August 30th, 2007
Lookin' back, on the track, for a little green bag...Got to find, just the kind, I'm losin' my mind...
August 30th, 2007
Needs more dog.
August 25th, 2007
Wow...u r slew on uptaik
March 2nd, 2007
OMG, it's so perfect. The BYAAAAAAHHH is exactly like the Tie-Fighter fly by sound. It's one of those "Dammit, why didn't I think of that YTMNDs."
September 19th, 2006
+1 for cool gif, +1 for unnecessary morbidity.
September 19th, 2006
On on the site ?Your head asplode
This is ooooolllllldddddd. +1 for effort.
September 19th, 2006
On on the site ?Home Depot Online App
Hertzfeldt-esque puzzled face ftw.
September 19th, 2006
On on the site ?Home Depot Online App
September 19th, 2006
I don't really like you, but you are probably necessary to YTMND, and this is a good site.
September 19th, 2006
September 19th, 2006
Red Alert 2, gg.
September 19th, 2006
+2 for 47
September 19th, 2006
har har.
September 19th, 2006
Well done.
September 19th, 2006
Movie seen, no twist, what's the point?
September 19th, 2006
On on the site ?FOUR, FIVE!
lol, now you're gonna die in that stupid hat.
September 19th, 2006
On on the site ?FOUR, FIVE!
FIVE!
September 17th, 2006
On on the site ?Rock on Myspacers!
sucks.
September 14th, 2006
Logged in to comment, 5'd.
September 8th, 2006
Can someone please explain this to me? I don't want to watch that again. Here's my problem. Causality holds that something, A, had to cause B. In order for this to be true, A would have to occur before B. "Before" is time-relative. Because the beginning of the Universe marks the beginning of time, (time is a part of the universe), there was no time "before" the universe began, so there is no "before the universe." If there is no time, there is no "before." It therefore seems naive to assume that causality is absolute law, and more naive still to use it as an argument for something existing "before" the universe existed.