it also works for things like that NEDM thing, but not for the creation of things unless you're talking about an exchange in energy that caused the formation of a new object. but it doesnt make sence in the way that you use it. you needed to actually generate your own loop hole in physics that some how makes God immune to physics and logic, you , sir have made an error in your logic, sorry, you fail. NEMD!
Ok... so what you're saying is that god must exsist because he was here before time exsisted so he doesnt need to adhear to the theory that you used to prove that the universe and matter was created.... you, my friend, didnt use logic. you see, you were using semantics first of all, and you based it off a thoery that, makes sence in some situations, but not all. you say that EVERYTHING in exsistence needs to be caused, this is not true that statement only works for the transfer of energy. not for the exsistence of time, matter, and everything else. for example, you can use it when speaking about a glass being knocked over, it was knocked over by something, a transfer of energy between two object, makes sence, or the example you used with the nuke.to be cont.
Elum's recent comments: