But, here, let me even up the tally by borrowing a little for myself: http://www.xkcd.com/386/ (Ugh, there's almost as much blue on this page as a gr33nsc33n site.)
Also, your tally is a tad off. I made ONE main point in my first reply, and it wasn't even for debate. So 0 for 1 or 0 for 0 would be more correct. However, if we were really keeping score, it would be closer to -120 to -130; there is inherently no winning this debate, but you lose an extra 10 points for borrowing someone else's wit. Not only that, but that article could as easily be applied to you. Besides, I refuse to read the Onion online so long as I am paying to receive it in print. You f*cking f*ggot.
Now for the off-topic topics.. I do not have to indicate my favor toward the subject of an analogy for it to be effective, and I did not assume anything about you; I made a generic example using a popular TV show. Nothing more, nothing less. It was YOUR inference and imbecilic inability to separate yourself from the situation that led to YOUR confusion, YA DIG? I actually called you both f*cking f*ggots in jest, but since you took the bait, I just couldn't resist persisting, you f*cking f*ggot.
I appreciate your impractical ideal for originality, but it seems you're still a bit confused as to what a character is. YOU STAY OUT OF THIS RAFE! Characters are merely vehicles to drive a situation, you see? I'm not sure what the English department at your community college told you, but I'm afraid characters as a literary device are here to stay. Now, it would be a more valid critique for one to say I used Mr. Peppers in a bland situation, but even then, I would argue that my effort was above average.
So, green fellow, you ran out of your own "intelligence" to spew at me? Lolcat's got your tongue? And you never even addressed my first reply, f*cking f*ggot.
Hey, idiot, don't mistake my analogy as a defense of Family Guy's humor. I happen to keep a certain disdain for Family Guy. Idiot. Besides from that, your own analogy proves you missed my point. Go read a book, f*cking f*ggot.
Hey now.. the way I see it, YTMND has a cast of characters, and these characters exist to play their respective roles. For example, Stephanie is YTMND's cute, innocent child, and Brian Peppers is YTMND's pedophile; he merely represents the idea of a pedophile, do you follow? I considered leaving out Mr. Peppers, but I thought it'd be more relevant to YTMND to let him stay. So, your 1-star ratings, in my opinion, would be like saying Family Guy sucks because it has the same stupid fat guy in every episode.
hm.... what kind of person is rich enough to waste money in an attempt to increase his unpopular site's popularity?... A JEW, that's who! JEWS DID "JEWS DID IRAQ WAR"!
Get over yourself. I appreciate your elite internet investigation skills, but you are SORELY mistaken. I recommend using PMs if you wish to continue this.
