Currently viewing  
 
seventy-one's profile:

Last Online:March 19
Member Since:2005-09-10

 seventy-one's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Muslims Against Terrorism6,33579
(3.68)

 seventy-one's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Muslims Against Terrorism6,33579
(3.68)

 seventy-one's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2007-10-30 15:18:46
 
Or did you also forget that the Quraysh deliberatley broke the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, which constituted an act of war?
+0
2007-10-30 15:18:08
 
As for the 800 Quarayza executed (something disputed by historians), whenever Muhammad judged a case regarding Jews, he referred to the Torah for punishment, and as treason was their crime, supposedly execution was their punishment as laid out in the Torah. And to say that Muhammad started the war with the Meccans is ludicrous. As I'm sure you know, and as I said before, the Muslims were persecuted to a horrendous degree in Mecca, and the Meccans sought to kill them wherever they fled.
+0
2007-10-30 15:13:39
 
As for the mother of five, are we talking about the same woman who conspired to kill Muhammad? As for the other vague descriptions, it would help to know who specifically you are talking about. With regards to "dozens of Jewish citizens, including poets and merchants who were accused of mocking Islam, numerous adulterers, at least one slave girl" Who exactly are you reffering to? Its hard to argue against your vague statements.
+0
2007-10-30 14:56:51
 
The person you mentioned who was executed as he was crying out for his children was one of two men murdered by angry soldiers (not executed on the orders of Muhammad) for dumping sheep excrement on Muhammad. You have to understand that the soldiers on the Muslim side were men who were persecuted, harrased, driven out of their homes, and murdered by the Meccans and the Quaraysh for what they believed in. I'm not excusing the actions, but they are understandable.
+0
2007-10-30 14:50:03
 
*None of the points you made in the statement were specific enough to argue. Now, I'll adress the actual points you made (or whoever made them first):
+0