Currently viewing  
 
imnotsatan's profile:

Last Online:Monday 15:25
Member Since:2005-06-29

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 imnotsatan's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  The Virgin Miley22215
(3.40)
?  Heath Ledger's Take on the Recent Deaths25012
(3.25)
?  Shell2172
(2.50)
?  Gaytmnd; Let's Do it Again!!!51611
(2.09)
?  Lice!!!5,389231
(3.81)

 imnotsatan's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Tetris Master 16,115437
(4.11)
?  (nsfw) Stimpy is Violated (ren and stimpy)9,766195
(4.06)
?  Hast Thou Milk? (Jesus + Oreos)5,97757
(3.91)
?  Osaka's turn to the Dark Side (Azumanga Star Wars)18,007127
(3.86)
?  The greatest adventure!2,6466
(3.83)

 imnotsatan's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2007-07-25 09:55:34
 
What's the name of that song playing while you're narrating? The sound origin says martin mcdonalds, is that the composer?
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-05-18 23:18:24
 
I am mormon, therefore i love this ytmnd! :D
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-12-19 18:19:51
 
Slow. Framerate.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-09-09 18:51:48
 
This is not prosteliting. It is a stated opinion and his explaination of his reasoning. IF he goes posting a link to this ytmnd around the internet, then it becomes prosteliting. If you disagree, then go away. You chose to click on the page, you chose to keep watching. If there was a PTKFGS of this ytmnd (inverse opinion, ie god absolutly cannot exist), then this page would not be getting this kind of negative attention. Sounds like instead of realizing probabilities, a lot of you idiots simply dismiss and downvote out of stubbornness or lack of reasoning. That is no better than the religious ultraconservatives who refuse to believe a shred of science unless it works in their favor. They have closed minds to new information, and so do you.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-03-06 00:58:08
 
Online. I actually had this up before the whole "Wonderful Time" craze erupted. Makes me feel kinda warm and fuzzy inside... X}
+0 [replies: 0]