Currently viewing  
 
ignisaves's profile:

Last Online:June 15
Member Since:2006-08-23

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 ignisaves's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  PUT SHOE ON HEAD(now with more Bush)5009
(2.33)
?  Your Brain on Rave1768
(2.88)
?  TOURNAMENTMND1: I Love Watching Football11911
(3.18)
?  Lonely Swirly 1141
(2.00)
?  Funny Night Tonight: Theme Site2383
(1.67)

 ignisaves's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  (nsfw) PINK FLOYD3,520167
(3.98)
?  LED ZEPPELIN1,93990
(3.86)
?  (nsfw) Clown? For Bob5068
(3.75)
?   DNMTY (mad lib)4724
(3.50)
?  Statistics is boring still...33412
(3.42)

 ignisaves's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2009-05-18 12:00:00
 
HJimOah3 !
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-04-14 18:09:27
 
To truly be utterly amazing we must retain that which makes us chaotic.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-04-12 17:57:48
 
That would be bad.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-03-04 05:29:07
 
I was at State once. I probably saw this kid, or stole his beer at a cool frat party.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-02-23 17:42:01
 
Technically, he could never lose, no matter the question. After all, he is part of the program that's generating the questions, at this point. However, this begs the question; would the program, the matrix, let another program, said agent, kick jeopardy ass? What would be the real gain? Some shifting in 1's and 0's? This ytmnd is flawed.
+6 [replies: 0]