Currently viewing  
 
MadamPurse's profile:

Last Online:November 22
Member Since:2006-06-04

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 MadamPurse's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  I spelled Eric Bauman Wrong =(81145
(3.20)
?  PTKFGS: 5 Star Project (Now 100% Work Safe!)4,590404
(3.94)
?  My damn test site2528
(3.00)
?  YTMND Radio has moved!!!40510
(2.50)
?  What's classier than Ernest?1,05315
(3.80)

 MadamPurse's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  PTKFGS: 5 Star Project (Now 100% Work Safe!)4,590404
(3.94)
?  What's classier than Ernest?1,05315
(3.80)
?  I spelled Eric Bauman Wrong =(81145
(3.20)
?  Cosby Busts ...35514
(3.00)
?  My damn test site2528
(3.00)

 MadamPurse's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2009-10-09 01:25:57
 
Give me minuses!
+7 [replies: 0]
2009-10-05 17:46:37
 
ur a bitch
+1 [replies: 0]
2009-10-05 17:44:46
 
damnit I was about to DarthWang this but then it turned out to be 5
+1 [replies: 0]
2009-10-05 12:23:12
 
By the way, KelvinPlanck, it's called a Clausius Device.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-10-05 12:13:02
 
Q(h) + Q(c) = 0; S = -Q(h)/T(h) - Q(c)/T(c); since Q(h) = -Q(c) = Q we can say S = Q[1/T(h) - 1/T(c)]; 1/T(h) < 1/T(c) and Q is positive so there would need to be a reduction in entropy, which we ALL know can't happen. Oh and by the way, the right answer was "c*cks"
+0 [replies: 1]