Oh, furthermore, all the arguments you make are things that philosophers have been wrestling with for ages - really since the beginning of philosophy. More recently astrophysicists have entered the picture. And none of them have resolved it. Ultimately any 'proof' still requires presuppositions or a 'leap of faith.'
You still haven't proved God exists. It's equally plausible that space-time-matter came from nothingness, timelessness, etc as it is plausible that it came from some 'divine being.' It's only due to the nature of logic that we have such difficulty imagining something out of nothing. That's what makes your argument so compelling - b/c it makes logical sense. However, my point is that we must step outside the confines of logic in order to understand something out of nothing.
