Recent comments this user has made:
Site When Comment
2009-03-31 18:15:34
 
The power of nerdrage is surging!
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-02-10 01:32:18
 
impressive. the gif is yours, I hope?
+0 [replies: 1]
2009-02-10 01:29:54
 
made of God and Win
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-02-10 01:24:13
 
Original, and pretty damn funny.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-02-10 01:22:08
 
wow, so much original content here.
-3 [replies: 1]
2009-02-10 01:20:32
 
We put people on U&C for just having successful sync now? Meh, at least it's original, and cited properly.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-02-10 01:18:42
 
wtf is this sh*t. No, really... there's nothing original to see here. Enjoy your 1.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-02-10 01:10:47
 
wow, ink, you pretty much took the words out of my mouth.
+0 [replies: 0]
2008-10-28 00:47:25
 
why is this site scheduled to be deleted???? It can't be!
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-07-19 19:53:04
 
There are also picture ads for Harry Potter ringtones popping up now... weird. -1 for a fairly overused song.... It's Vigilante - Answers by the way.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-07-18 14:52:17
 
At least I didn't use Yellow LedBetter I guess
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-07-16 15:06:06
 
lol +100
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-07-12 19:57:18
 
hmmm... the nsfw is gone. Is Max not gracious?
+1 [replies: 0]
2007-07-12 06:03:45
 
We get this site. It's even a decent site, I guess, when you consider that people make YTMNDs that have people ranting about WOW all the time. It's just that we all already know what's going to happen here. Some idiot is going to post this on the WOW forums, and this will stay up on the top viewed for about 2 weeks. I don't know about you, but I'm sick of sh*tty or even average sites dominating the top viewed just because they get posted on various forums.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-07-12 00:00:03
 
The LGF'ers that weren't also YTMNDers bashed YTMND relentlessly. One even reported the site, and then reported the site to Henson.com They brought this upon themselves.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-07-11 18:14:53
 
Agreeing with Necromicon here.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-07-06 09:15:57
 
When someone takes a picture of a landmark, such as the grand canyon, they don't entitle it "earth". They put "grand canyon". Same principle here. Seriously, how hard is it to copy and paste the web address into the image origin slot? Some of us might be in need of his shocking services.
+6 [replies: 0]
2007-07-04 10:28:54
 
It's the internets. If "your friend" post pictures like that, its their own fault if they get reposted other places. hard luck.
+3 [replies: 0]
2007-07-03 16:06:37
 
Holy Christ... the first raid was marginally good... back on MLK day of 06. This is at least the third raid in 07; just search "Habbo Raid". I can't give this any higher than a 2.
-3 [replies: 1]
2007-06-10 18:05:35
 
I had to increase my brightness from normal (50/100) to bright (75/100) to see this myself, so I suppose it depends on what you consider as "low" brightness settings. Still worth a 4.
-1 [replies: 0]
2007-06-05 09:51:33
 
I didn't want to five this, but the edits were just too good.
+1 [replies: 0]
2007-05-27 00:53:09
 
anonymous delivers.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-05-26 22:51:59
 
what do you win? He b& the other guy for less
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-05-24 05:26:09
 
Random Banner guy with his arms up in victory ftw
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-05-21 01:35:12
 
Against the ytmnd TOS, and reported.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-04-09 14:08:11
 
Your honest opinion is appreciated.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-04-09 14:07:04
 
Your dislike of this site has been duly noted, as well as your abhorrence for spelling and inability use higher levels of thinking.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-04-09 10:29:11
 
50k views before noon? How many WOW idiots clicked on this damn thing?
-4 [replies: 0]
2007-04-05 20:15:53
 
refresh once in IE and maybe twice in firefox for good sync
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-04-03 13:54:05
 
Ytmnd doesn't make any profit off of their stolen content, whereas other sites such as ebaumsworld and collegeslackers.com do.
+1 [replies: 0]
2007-04-02 23:54:01
 
Yep, the whole point of this YTMND was to pwn the guys at collegeslackers.com. You have seen through my facade. And I'm sure they will see this, even though they are so lazy, that they won't even remove blatantly stolen content.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-04-02 23:06:13
 
This YTMND isn't about raiding, or about the YTMND community being offended. It's about a moronic response to collegeslacker.com hosting stolen content. Perhaps you should vote based on this YTMND, instead of your own personal feelings about sh*t that isn't relevant.
+1 [replies: 0]
2007-04-02 22:59:24
 
9 Disks, though that really doesn't have any relevance to this YTMND
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-04-02 19:56:33
 
music was fairly loud, so I toned it down a bit.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-04-02 19:52:13
 
their argumentative skills are impressive.... http://rebuttal.ytmnd.com/
+1 [replies: 0]
2007-03-15 20:27:44
 
it's a fake list, from about a month ago I guess. It was just a list of the users that were on at the time. Fooled a lot of people though.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-14 16:01:16
 
new fad. Now.
-1 [replies: 0]
2007-03-14 16:00:11
 
pi day was actually on 3/14/1592 or 3/14/1593 depending on how you round. 4'd for effort though.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-14 12:08:09
 
just like this site will be upvoted because people think you are Sitsu.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 22:59:50
 
This is directly for Captainfuzion. Any of my sites are better than the drivel you could spew onto this website. I guarantee it. Also, fusion was probably the word you were looking for.
-2 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 21:43:45
 
how do you get aesthetically right, and miss "strait "?
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 21:11:16
 
5 stars from the masters. I am honored.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 19:24:36
 
McDonuts, you are either a n00b that hasn't been on YTMND for a week, or you're an alt of some other douchebag. Either way, GTFO.
-2 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 18:21:34
 
Thanks for the support guys. As far as the idea being in the works for a while, I answer by saying that search has been broken for a while; ergo, I've had a while to think about how to create this ytmnd. The only YTMNDs I saw that were even remotely like this one were from long ago, and none used this exact idea.
-1 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 14:29:59
 
You're still cool in my book, BTape. Come visit us at SFW forums more often.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 14:28:32
 
rtgcom, here is my challenge. Make a site today. If it ranks better than this site at 12:00 EST, I will delete myself from YTMND permanently. If it doesn't, then go kill yourself. Agreed?
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 14:25:10
 
as I explained earlier, I searched for 300tmnd because 1. it was a recent fad and 2. it returned 0 results. Searching "YTMND" produced results, and after I found that 300TMND had 0 results, I didn't bother trying any other searches.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 13:18:36
 
For those users that don't use quick search and aren't understanding this joke (maybe 0.05 percent of YTMND users) quick search can be found to the left of that big YTMND logo in the center of your browser. Also here http://www.ytmnd.com/list/
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 13:12:01
 
I used 300TMND because it pulled up 0 results... which was obviously wrong. I was going to search for 'YTMND', but that actually worked. 8,390 results or something.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 13:06:14
 
other comments and feedback are as always greatly appreciated.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 13:05:14
 
perhaps I should rename the site "'quick search' doesn't work", to help renegade64 out. Although he does have my appreciation for pointing out the best way to search ytmnd.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-13 07:38:55
 
Ok, since you thought of this first, you get a 5.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-10 17:05:26
 
Ok, since you have an explanation for the sources, I'll up your score. Dunno what the hell the Family Guy tirade is about, though.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-03 09:14:15
 
"wow MasterSitsu is such a douchebag" qft. the fact that it didn't make the top ten was because the contest was so blatantly rigged. This site isn't disgraceful to ytmnd, at least not as disgraceful as thousands of other ytmnds. 5'd.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-02 19:41:19
 
Dammit inkdrinker, I wanted to 5 this but you forgot the fundamentals of citing your sources.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-02 15:03:46
 
win.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-03-02 12:23:52
 
_ |_
+1 [replies: 0]
2007-02-27 13:54:58
 
I'll give it a 2, just because I post on those forums.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-02-24 10:36:53
 
Korf's a douche. He might not be as big of a douche if he would actually cite some of the sites that use this exact concept. Maybe. 5'd to counteract.
+0 [replies: 0]
2007-02-20 18:00:11
 
Needs chapstick sword. still good though
+0 [replies: 0]