You forgot about this profile old chum. Owner of Max's only 5 vote over the past 3 months. ;-)

-1

There are more? Please list them all so I can be happy.

Finally! I've been holding my tongue for months. You have no idea how hard it was for me and my big mouth not to reveal how thoroughly you fooled these dweebs.

+1

Also - offical YTMND contest winner!

-1

Umfuld / Umfuld / Umfuld / Umfuld / Umfuld / Umfuld / Umfuld / Umfuld / Poland

+2

I love the drawing. Don't worry good sir, I've incurred his downvoting wrath as well by enjoying most sites and voting 5 on them.

curse you prairedogeric and your power to make me vote 5

+1

and Scalabrine is fouled!

I actually liked that site.

-1

What 'actually'? I make the best sites. This profile should be pink!

-1

Oh yeah, you're Tile.

-1

OK, so I have a question. Are you related at all to the EvianEightBall account or was it a total coincidence that he hates me too and quit within a day or two of your last disappearance and just came back yesterday? If so, you did a great job making that account seem like a fourest alt way back when it first appeared as ViralFreedom. If not, well that's just some wacky ytmnd hatred karma there.

+1

I'm not totally sure what you just said but no. Not me.

-1

Umfuld usually spells "gr33nscr33n" with a capital G, unless he was trying to throw you off.

Umfuld doesn't spell greenscreen any way because Umfuld can't comment - you insensitive prick!

+1

Check out http://ytmnd.com/users/EvianEightball/comments It's pretty uncanny if that ain't you.

oh yeah, I forgot about the 3's being e's

That's nothing like me greeny. Plus I'm not a frickin' jew. ??? What the hell's wrong with you?

-1

EvianEightball leaves long comments, but they are just long enough to fill up the space allowed when typing text into a box. Umfuld goes into a word document and types long comments and then pastes them into the text box.

That's true. I do. F*ck that if I'm going to wait 30 seconds to post my entire wall of text.

-1

He's an Israel hating Jew. That makes him just self-effacing enough to be the same guy who makes comments about beating off to Clarissa Explains it All in the midst of a debate about artf*g circle jerking. Seemed plausible to me. Though I'd never seen you use sprites like he did so i thought you'd worked really hard on that account if it was you.

+1

I'd sooner beat off to an adult woman than use sprites in a site.

+1

Also, while we're coming clean here: http://ytmnd.com/users/notdeadyet I was curious to see if I still had it in me to pull some wool. I figured it was pretty obvious who it was until I watched spy and saw people who absolutely hate gr33nscr33n fiving away like simple-minded dorks.

Which reminds me, I should go through delete those votes now.

I have no doubt I've praised people I hate unknowingly and bashed people I'm big fans of too. You can't worry about it. It's just the internets. No one really wins, despite the many claims.

-1

Wow, no fighting. Hey wisdumcube, join in the fun!

If pde deleted this site right now, no one would ever believe him.

ericdog, the point of the rants on Ocho's site was that was my drama entry. Get it? But wisdumcube is a c*nt. I was going to make a site using the rape scene from Once Upon A Time In America and head paste the wisdumcube over the girl's head. To be honest, I decided not to do it because what I was planning was too disturbing even for me.

-1

Irreversible.

I've beat off to that more than once.

-1

Worse than assmaster.ytmnd.com? I had to edit that one with gloves and googles on.

By the way for the record I still don't think I can access Cumion and Scumion anymore becuase of that time I downvoted wang and r-nax with all my alts. But credit to r-nax he never said anything even though I commented with them all - he just did it back to me and I eventually had to ask max to make him stop. He owned me. I gladly admit it. Darthwang just cried like a woman and hasn't stopped since - in other words I owned him.

-1

Isn't r-nax a steakman alt? I always assumed so.

+1

Hey, Nothingman. You are now on the list.

Er I mean, Umfuld or gr33nscr33n or oh f*ck it. Everyone else but me might as well be the same nerd, ala gr33n's theory.

nothingman is an umfuld alt? cool i like nothingman sites. i wish i never knew now.

Umfuld sometimes makes good sites, but he just doesn't know how to stop nagging people. Consequently, it's his attitude that people vote on, not his content.

...and consequently you prove his point yet again. I really recommend not posting comments for a few days, wisdum.

What point was that gr33nscr33n?

Wiscumcube’s comment translated: When Umfuld catches people like me cheating to replace everyone else’s sites on the front page with those of me and my friends he’ll sometimes point out that it’s wrong to do that. We in turn downvote him for speaking up about our abuse. He doesn't’t seem care, and does it anyway. Because of this he may be the greatest man alive.

"We"? I never downvote your sites don't pair me with those that do. I like a lot of your sites.

Cube you give out 5s like they were sperm. But I don't really remember ever getting any from you. Remember a lot of 4s and 3s - which for you - is a downvote. But I don't care. This site is about me. Shut up. Go make some more voting alts, I think MrSinistar is ready for you to circle jerk his skinny c*ck. You f*cking gaylord.

lol

There is a difference between mentioning it once, and consistently reminding users that they "cheat". Do you not think they may heard you the first time? And if they don't change their ways what makes you think that telling them again will convince them otherwise?

Cube, you will never stop. MrSinistar's next 100 sites will get exactly 500 stars from you. Same with 20 other people who all do the same for you. That's not how the voting system should be used. Don't you think you should stop being a scumbag who ruins this place before I stop pointing it out? You will never stop. It will just continue to be: Auto 5 + Wall of Text Lies / Auto 5 + Wall of Text Lies / Auto 5 + Wall of Text Lies - forever

And for the record - I don't want to have this f*cking conversation with you again. I'm not going around starting comment strings about you. I only reply to your wall of text lies. Don't like my replies when you call me out by name? Hmm. I wonder what you can do to f*cking stop it. Moron.

You really are something else. Would you like to post some cold hard evidence for once?

Okay - it'll brb

ytmnd.com/users/wisdumcube/votes

ytmnd.com/users/mrsinistar/votes

ultimatevictory.ytmnd.com

ytmnd.com/users/fourest/votes

ytmnd.com/users/dmaz/votes

ytmnd.com/users/wisdumcube/sites

All that shows is that we have high averages, and that steakman was making a vacuous complaining site.

You asked for the evidence. You didn't ask for the mental capacity to understand it. You'll have to talk to god about that. By the way, when are you going to hit me up with the 'lol, you're so easy to troll'? As if pointing out what a scumbag failure you are to your face is anything but a joy to me. F*cking sap.

It is possible to find some correlation, but then again, I could also draw an as likely conclusion that you met each other in real life, hit it off, and now you are friends who defend each other on the internet. This was all drawn from the fact that he finally agreed with one of your points. Does it make it true? Absolutely not.

Does anyone know what he's talking about with the steakman thing? Or the meeting in r/l thing? Anyone? Who are you talking to?

Well, it is easy to suck you into arguments but, we've already established that. There is no need for me to remind you. And don't worry, I acknowledge full well that I am easy too.

are you guys still talking about this?????????? geez!

Oh, I was mentioning gr33nsr33n. That was silly how I left that out.

What you said didn't make any sense. To anyone. No one mentioned steakman. But sorry I'm not so easy to troll as you and your gay friend might think. I delight in the fact that present yourself to me - like a virgin nearing the volcano's edge - time and time again. I understand now why the IRC f*gs enjoyed ridiculing you to no f*cking end. It's addictive. You just don't have a f*cking clue about anything. But, lucky for Sinistar - your 5s still count the same as everyone else. Or should I say 10s?

Or maybe its the other way around Umfuld? But no, you couldn't possibly be wrong, ever. Everyone else must be wrong, that's why they minus you, they are jealous. Why do you keep making stuff up? If I'm so clueless, how could I possibly organize a circle jerk crew? You are logic is so confusing.

Cube - I actively seek out people, like you, who abuse the system here and downvote them. You upvote them with multiple profiles. Do you REALLY think the +/- by our names indicates anything beyond that? Tell me you're not that f*cking stupid. --- Organize a circle jerk? Yeah that's hard to do, isn't it? Pretty much just vote 5 and you're in. Just never forget - you're the cancer that killed Y

lickitwellhiem - You have to admit - it beats clicking on YTMNDs and viewing them.

it can be fun to participate. the social aspect is interesting. the most fun is making sites tho.

Sometimes its better, that's why I argue with you. If it wasn't fun, I wouldn't bother. Do you think that just because something logically makes sense, it is the only possible answer? Alien existence makes sense, but we have no proof, so no one claims to know extraterrestial life exists. Sure if I was not me, and I was a bit of a conspiratorial paranoid like you, I could see the connection, but that just isn't the reality, sorry. I don't upvote people expecting fives in return. That is the truth.

Gosh, the word of a proven liar. That means so much to me. Cube - your sites suck. Because your friends forced them into so many views - YTMND died. Because no one visits websites that have garbage content. You're the cancer that killed Y.

there are so many reasons why the site has sucked lately, and no one can pretend to know all of them. youre acting like its all wisdums fault, lol. look at half the crap that gets upvoted, and historically been upvoted, and tell me the average, non-ytmnd internet user would even understand it let alone think it was funny content. and gee, we have a site owner that thinks its a joke to post gay thug dating ads, who began his internet career as a troll (not negative criticism max) but gee, maybe the...

...internet community at large got tired of 4 mb low quality gifs of the same sh*t over and over. i think you both offer great content. i really dont think anyone can point fingers. wisdums's damage is a much as yours, with all the negativity, alienation and fingerpointing you generate. the thing is niether of you really put in that much of a dent. i used to cheat too. now i dont. who cares.

hopeudie.ytmnd.com

-1

**4 mb sites, rather, with low quality gifs

lol, your user screencap site where u didnt respond to my pms, and then you did.

Please go on about how you don't think vote whoring damages the site - because your opinion on that matter holds great weight with me.

-1

butt

secks

Define: "vote whoring".

ytmnd.com/users/wisdumcube/votes

I agree with both lickit's and improviser's deep thoughtful input. Ramen.

ytmnd.com/browse/top_viewed/yesterday

2,000 views is the highest? That's pretty low, further proof that ytmnd is is in a dire situation.

Having a large number of high votes doesn't hurt the site as long as you discriminate, and I do. If a site I think is crappy makes Up and coming I will vote it down. I barely touch recently created where most of the sh*tty sites dwell...and that is why the average is so high. Come on man, we've been through this before.

Look at MrSinistar's last 20 sites. Are there ANY you didn't vote 5 on? How many did you vote 5 on more than once? How many people for you is that true for? THAT'S WHY THE SITE DIED. Because people used come here to be entertained - not to see how you and your gay friends spent the previous night. When that became the only choice - PEOPLE STOPPED COMING. I'll be back in 15 minutes to explain this to you again.

Wow, this just keeps getting sadder. Did you really think "It is possible to find some correlation, but then again, I could also draw an as likely conclusion that you met each other in real life, hit it off, and now you are friends who defend each other on the internet" would somehow help your argument?

Well, yes, but then again, I am simply arguing against Umfuld's points. It is really simply gr33n. You think its ridiculous right? well, that is exactly how I view umful's arugment that I circle jerk just because I have a high average. It's ridiculous just like it is ridiculous to insinuate that you are good buddies now just because you agreed with umfuld on a couple of things.

I just read the whole thing.

How nerdy do you feel now, prairiedogeric?

Wait...what?

Actually, no, it isn't the same. And that is precisely the problem here: you keep using subjective "logic" to rationalize a behavior with a direct, quantifiable cause and effect. You do this behavior, it has been documented and presented to you. The behavior has a cause which has also been proven to you. You just refuse to admit it to yourself or to others. Hence the crazy, cyclical logic strewn across this comment thread and so many others.

"Look at MrSinistar's last 20 sites. Are there ANY you didn't vote 5 on? How many did you vote 5 on more than once? How many people for you is that true for?" 1. About 5. And that is mostly because I don't usually vote on the ones that suck. 2. I think there was that one time. 3. I only voted with the account for about two months and they were mostly random sites (except for the sinistar site I fav'd), and the majority of tourney sites. I think that's it. I don't really memorize these things to be honest.

For instance: "...I circle jerk just because I have a high average" What other explanation is there for not giving out a wide range of votes other than fear of reprisals? Maybe you're not friends with every single one of the users who made the sites you 5d so you don't classify it as circle jerking but that doesn't change the fact that you and many like you here are concerned enough with your own vote ratings that you do not call it out when you view crap.

Inside the Cube - "Just because there are 3 dozen people who I only ever have voted 5 on (some with multiple accounts) and who have only ever voted 5 on my sites does not mean I am part of a circle jerk. Furthermore the fact that since fourest and the others on my AIM contact list took over YTMND the traffic has dropped 90% has nothing to do with said circle jerk take over. Also, I look great in these dungarees."

Logic is subjective. Facts are objective. Can you really have it any other way? I just vote high most of the time, and that goes for everyone. That's it. It's not some grand conspiracy. "What other explanation is there for not giving out a wide range of votes other than fear of reprisals" I don't like sh*tting on other people's work. Remember, I wasn't the one that decided that I should be the beacon of objectivity and morality. Once I got popular everyone just expected me to change and be that guy.

So I dare you to spend one week openly 1ing the bullsh*t that clogs up RC (which includes BloodyPython's sixth site in six hours, or every Moonman site, or throwaway sites by keaton). 1 (or 2, if it's not completely crap) and comment on each of them. You don't even need to be an *ssh*le about it. Just vote and say something helpful like "screen shots of forum threads aren't really very funny to people who weren't there." Or whatever. I guarantee you will see your site ratings drop significantly.

Out of the 30 votes on that accounts list there were THREE sinistar sites. This why we keep calling you a liar. And the indeed, if that's true about 5 sites you didn't vote on of his - you should have. The reason you didn't is because you only want 5s in return. Understand? Because we all do. THAT'S WHAT A CIRCLE JERK IS. "I only give 5s - and gosh - what I get back is mostly only 5s!" I refuse to believe that you're so stupid that you think that all these people 5 you because they like you sites.

"Once I got popular everyone just expected me to change and be that guy." Actually, you elected yourself. I'm some cross between popular and despised here. I know how I got that way and I did it on purpose. So did you. If a user who's been a part of a content-based community like this doesn't know how they landed their role in that community, they are either: 1. 13 years old, 2. stupid, or 3. a stupid 13-year old.

And now that a lot of other users have left, and the rest ignore you, the blame now lays squarely at my feet. This is not just some martyr complex--I never signed up to be Jesus. The fact that I am the center of anything just proves how badly off ytmnd really is. I wanted attention, but I was never trying to be a leader or a mentor or whatever. Really at this point, its all nitpicking because only more users could save ytmnd, not vote squandering. Everyone is going to have biases, you can't change that.

Also, regarding "...just like it is ridiculous to insinuate that you are good buddies now just because you agreed with umfuld on a couple of things." I'm not here defending or attacking any specific user. I'm arguing for sanctity of fact and logic. It pains me that anyone can be so incapable of accepting the reality of their actions. I don't even care that much about the actions themselves. I just hate the refusal to own one's reality.

I know how it happened, but I didn't choose it. I got pushed in that direction, because it seems like you can never be somewhere in between on ytmnd. Everything is black and white. You either have to be perfect, or you are a sham. I always wanted to be an intermediate level of popular. Maybe I could have handled it if ytmnd was still thriving, but I can't when there is so very little incentive to be.

Cube - you are not popular. You are a running joke with the old timers who actually make good sites and you don't even rate enough to be a target of trolls. You're just a tiny cog in the circle (fourest) that killed YTMND. If you want to call that popular, well, knock yourself out.

You keep catching so much flack here because you keep responding with cyclical, reality-denying comments. If you want the flack to stop, you have two choices: 1. take me up on my dare and vote a fair spread despite the results it will take on your site ratings or 2. quit responding to comment threads like this with crazy moon-logic. Pretty simple, Jesus.

"I refuse to believe that you're so stupid that you think that all these people 5 you because they like you sites." And this is why you will never understand my position. You are just too damn arrogant. Since you don't like my sites, you figure no one else really likes them, and the ratings must be ill-gotten. People have different tastes. Do you honestly think lickitwellhiem was lying just so he could get more 5s? People gravitate towards each other because we are a community, we create cliques.

There is nothing arrogant in someone having a negative opinion of someone else's ::cough:: art. The arrogance lies in your denial that giving out 10,000 5s while at the same time giving almost no 1s, 2s or 3s has a positive effect on the voters own site scores. It's nothing short of insanity to suggest that - yet here you are. Doing just that. And somehow I'm the one who is arrogant? You sites suck. You need to circle jerk to get them views. You're part of the circle jerk that killed YTMND. /thread

"Cyclical, reality-denying comments" The results are cyclical because the arguments against me are cyclical. And I guess I will go and downvote some sites if you really want gr33nscr33n. But it has nothing to do with ratings. And its okay that I am a running joke. I was willing to sacrifice some of my internet dignity when I decided to argue with you repeatedly. It's all for the sake of having fun, after all. I think their energy would be better spent coming back and making sites though.

Hey guys, I found this site so bad it made me mad. It's one of the worst sites I've seen this year. Dragonballeee.ytmnd.com

"There is nothing arrogant in someone having a negative opinion of someone else's ::cough:: art." There is a difference between having a negative opinion, and claiming that it is a fact that my sites are not any good. Your logic consists of this: "wisdumcube's sites suck but they get high ratings, therefore the rating are fraudulent." Here is the logic surrounding a non-arrogant opinion: "wisdumcube's sites suck, but they get high ratings, therefore I must have different tastes in humor/'interest in art".

Well, I am popular enough for people to talk about me at least. And I was a little popular site-wise for a little while, but what counts as popular on ytmnd these days?

Sorry, Hank. I liked it. I probably shouldn't have because it uses koen and DBZ, but I liked it. Also, gr33nscr33n, there is nothing crazy about defending your worth as a ytmnder. If all I need to do to solidify my position is downvote sites for a week, then the opposing argument wasn't strongly conclusive in the first place.

You sites could be good and you could still be in a circle jerk cube. No one is saying that can't be so. Fearcondom is an example. But you're not fearcondom. You have almost no natural comedic ability. In speech, behavior and certainly not in sites. It's a comedy site + You aren't funny. Your score are simply a reflection of the fact that you have given out 10,000 5s with no downvotes and are friends with the most notorious cheats YTMND has ever had. Also, please don't stop replying. More! More!

this is like a magic cookie jar. every time I refresh the page, there's a new cookie

+2

"You have almost no natural comedic ability. In speech, behavior and certainly not in sites. It's a comedy site + You aren't funny." All of these points are debatable, yet you structure your argument as if they are fact. ytmnd is a place for creativity, not just humor. I very rarely create content for the sake of humor. Most that exist already existed in its current context before I made the site. I figured that since we had fearcondom and Ochobobo,etc etc, I shouldn't try, and instead find my own niche.

No. That you aren't funny isn't really debatable cube as this comment page shows. All these words - YOU HAVEN'T SAID A SINGLE THING THAT IS CLOSE TO FUNNY!!!! But please, go ahead, debate that you are funny. I really want to see that.

I can't debate with humor. You know what, I am going to try something. I am not going to make a site unless I think it is funny for a while, happy? I'll really try again, just for a little while at least. I'll invest more time in downvoting sites. And then whatever happens after that happens. I have to show you why I argue the position I do, and I'm sorry that I put so much energy into long text arguments instead of sitemaking, and voting. The only thing that could further this discussion is action.

Cube I don't give a sh*t what you do. You're a teeny tiny part of a the problem. I just want you to shut up when you don't have anything to f*cking say. We probably broke the record for most comments in a string ever outside of C*ckrum and you didn't make a single valid point. Not one. All those words - how is it you didn't have a single f*cking point? Is there any chance you'll just realize that and kill yourself? No. That joy will not be mine.

? Site about Umfuld 2009-07-20 23:37:30 Improviser and Scalabrine is fouled! -1 [replies: 106]

Hey guys! What's still going on this thread?!

"All those words - how is it you didn't have a single f*cking point? Is there any chance you'll just realize that and kill yourself? No. That joy will not be mine." You are a sad sad little man child. You can't even keep your emotions under control. I'm doing this to see what gr33nscr33n thinks. He is reasonable.

can i hang out with you guys

+1

Oh hi guys. I just wanted to make a teeny tiny point. Ummy, just over a year ago you left this comment for me: "So I just voted on all your sites. Rating around 3.75. Insanely above average. |:-)". So, as long as your tastes haven't drastically changed since then, you like most of my sites and (presumably) you think their scores are more fully deserved than Wisdumcube's scores…

…but I am also friends with Wisdum, MrSinistar, dmaz, etc. so whatever circle-jerk advantage you think they get, to some extent I get it too. Yet, on average, my sites are less popular than theirs. I have no illusions: my sites do worse because they are worse. They are not as catchy or imaginative or skilful. End of story.

The "circle-jerk" counts for very little. Most of Wisdumcube's sites get over 100 votes. When it comes to that level of exposure, a half-dozen predestined 5s does not introduce very much bias into a site's score. Most of the people who vote on Wisdum's sites really genuinely like his sites. He's GOOD. (Not all the time, but more often than me.)

+1

You are free to have different tastes, and of course you should always be free to speak your mind. However, de gustibus non disputandum est. There is no arguing about taste. And I think you're trying to hijack what is at heart a disagreement about taste and using it, instead, as a vehicle for whatever insults and accusations you feel like hurling at my friends from time to time. It's pretty obvious that you're not interested in entertaining the possibility that they ever merit their popularity.

+1

YTMND is a website for websites!!! Post an image and

+2

Hi fatalis and rafe.

+1

are you guys like this in real life? you can't all possibly be like this in real life.

Oh god no. I would have to shoot myself if I cared as much as I appeared to care on these comment pages. Really, this is just a big cluster f*ck of cross-trolling. Though there are some legitimate points to be had here.

I just fell in love with you.

+1

I think it's important to let the kids out there know that even though I have many sexy YTMND profiles I DO NOT vote more than once an sites and I never vote on my own sites. As you can see here I'd like nothing more than to 5 this site again and force my name onto top viewed - but that wouldn't be fair to everyone else who made sites this week. So play fair kids and never cheat. Or I'll catch you and f*ck you in the *ss with my mighty Umfuld c*ck.

-9 [show comment][hide comment]

I however have no claim to such moral integrity. 5 to keep the fun going until max bans the whole goddamned lot of us.

+2

thank you gr33nscr33nstopsecretalt

+2

I think its time to perform CPR!

CCR

The moral integrity of the internet is like a burning toothpick bridge trying to hold the weight of atlas on its back.

+3

with shadebrand's help.... btw I know ©�¶®

5'd for Umfuld's moral integrity

+1

At first I was terribly upset that that comment was getting -'d so much because it's such a important sentiment and I think it's one that needs to be heard. But then I remembered what I wrote about my mighty penis and was no longer upset.

-4

Average Vote * 2 = Penis length

+3

Making up a site about Umfeld... he's a peach he's a doll he's a pal of mine...

5 for meteor

1 for feeding a troll.

+2

THIS IS THE FUNNIEST COMMENT ON THE PAGE

+4

"You have been banned from commenting." - That's what I see. When Umfuld tries to comment. And when doves cry.

-5

THIS IS THE SECOND FUNNIEST COMMENT ON THE PAGE... ohh wait...

Posting in epic comment thread.

-2

^swing and a miss.

+1

youmfold slash youmfold slash tile slash cumion slash cumion slash stephens. HOLYCRAPAMETEORE!!!!!!!!!!11

What a F*GGGGGOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT (seriously, he's gay)

+2

I can't keep up with you guys and all your different alt names.

+2

madDogSoldier is my alt

Account is my alt

+1

Locke5 is my alt

all my alts got deleted but i got a new one

i mean lol i never had any alts

also there's a falcon177 all the way to falcon183 that all voted 1 on one of my sites

http://shutups.ytmnd.com/ I fived this recently, and I fived a lot of your old batman sites but you deleted those I guess.

I dare you to spend one week openly 1ing the bullsh*t that clogs up RC (which includes BloodyPython's sixth site in six hours, or every Moonman site, or throwaway sites by keaton). 1 (or 2, if it's not completely crap) and comment on each of them. You don't even need to be an *ssh*le about it. Just vote and say something helpful like "screen shots of forum threads aren't really very funny to people who weren't there." Or whatever. I guarantee you will see your site ratings drop significantly.

+1

ahh f*ck, wrong hole.

+2

"cyclical, reality-denying comments" The results are cyclical because the arguments against me are cyclical. And I guess I will go and downvote some sites if you really want gr33nscr33n. It's has nothing to do with ratings. And its okay that I am a running joke. I was willing to sacrifice some of my internet dignity when I decided to argue with you repeatedly. It's all for the sake of having fun, after all. I think their energy would be better spent coming back and making sites though.

+1

gr33nscr33n: "ahh f*ck, wrong hole."

+1