f*cking emo

-26 [show comment][hide comment]

CRAAWWWWLING IIIINNNNN MY PILLLOWWY MOUUUNNDDDDSS OF MAAAASSSHHHED POOOTAATOOOOES!

+19

they commonly remake their music this is still bad

Dude, I kept waiting for the second song to come on. It wasn't until I read the description I realized both are playing at the SAME TIME and fit together that insanely perfectly. Jesus Christ.

+2

linkin park sucks ass

+1

wtf

-14 [show comment][hide comment]

dear god they stole from themselves

-11 [show comment][hide comment]

WIN

+6

emo... but I'll be f*cked by oscar the grouch if it doesn't actually match up perfectly. 4'd

+16

i'm using this site, among others, to vote 3 for so that i don't look like i give all 1s and 5s. thank you for your participation. +1 for "f*cked by oscar the grouch" comment........this isn't working out at all, from the 3 angle.

Aww they're gonna hafta glue these songs back together.... in HELL!

+17

Spy sappin' mah Linkin Park!

+22

Nothing justifies recycling music like this. Not Even Linkin Park Music.

+1

Just shows how sh*tty they really are

5'd for recognizing lazy musicians this is why I download music of course, I don't download this sh*t

-2

This works for any band if you think about it.

-8 [show comment][hide comment]

Only for the sh*tty ones... which is apparently all you listen to.

+34

It's easy to be a pseudointellctual and say something derogatory with the same amount of explanation as the pseudointellecutal.

-1

wrong reply meant to be for ther person below lol ;>

-1

Tool.

+3

It's easy to slow/speed up music to match that of another song.

-11 [show comment][hide comment]

It's not easy to change the chord progression.

+48

It's easy to be a pseudointellectual and say "It's not easy to change the chord progression."

-27 [show comment][hide comment]

It's easy to say "Who f*ckin' cares" then IMMA CHARGIN MY LAZOR and SHOOP DA WHOOP because Mike Shinoda pwns anyway.

Pseudointellectual? Just because he said chord progression? Jesus christ! Are you f*cking stupid? Chord progression is the most basic principle in music other than tempo. Linkin Park is complete bullsh*t because they can't come up with songs that stand out from each other, or others for that matter. Let us use a band who actually has talent (or used to.) Take any Metallica song and do this and they wont sync up like this... even IF you change the tempo. This is because they use original song ideas.

+5

You're right, but Metallica is extremely simplistic and repetitive in it's own ways.

+3

Lars molests children. Do you actually support a child molester? Gross.

+5

It's easy to downvote comments when you have 10 alts.

-5

It's easy to say "Metallica pours baboon sh*t both on their cereal and instruments"... Because Metallica pours baboon sh*t on their cereal and instruments.

+2

He did slow down numb so that makes this site a low quality jab at linkin park. They aren't the best and only the top bands don't repeat once in a while. (Led Zeppelin BY FAR and U2 I think have very unique music) No one tops the uniqueness of Led Zeppelin. If you hate linkin park then you can't really comment because music you don't like or listen too always sounds the same. This is horrible because, having listened to Linkin Park, Numb sounds heavily distorted. You can make anything look like anything.

-1

ha ha, that works kinda well.

It is green.

-2

You are 1'd at life

-18 [show comment][hide comment]

Linkin Park being a terrible band is old news.

+21

1. You can't steal from yourself. 2. Both songs were modified from their original versions. 3. Making fun of a band doesn't make you cool, especially when they make a sh*tload more money than your broke ass.

-4

1. How can you claim yourself to be a hypersaxon (this point is as stupid as yours)? 2. Thanks for pointing out the idea of the ytmnd -- Linkin Park appear to have trouble making original records. 3. Making fun of someone making fun of a site doesn't make you cool either, especially when you are making no money for doing this.

+4

Also, I think you're a fan of Linkin Park, Hypersaxon, which incredibly biases your view.

+1

http://archive.forums.linkinpark.com/member.php?u=459356 tbh

+4

"How can you claim yourself to be a hypersaxon" wow you're dumb my real name is Saxon and I'm the Hyperest motherf*cker on this goddamn planet. And making fun of hypersaxon doesn't make you cool, especially when you don't work at the Federal Plaza in downtown Milwaukee making fat loot you f*cking queer. PS Moon Man raped your mom and splooged on her face you dumb f*ck.

-3

PS I must be pretty cool since you've been voting 5 on my Moon Man sites XD

-4

Eh, I hate Linkin Park as much as the next guy, but the songs only match up because you made them match up. And it's not exactly breaking news that bands make music that sounds at least a little similar to their other music. Congrats on uncovering such a scandal!

+1

AMAZING THEY STEAL FROM THEIR OWN STYLE. Back after two years hiatus for the win.

-3

Linkin Park sucks balls like almost every other modern band with no talent, looks or style.

+8

Wait wait wait. You are obviously not old enough to remember the 80s.

+3

hair metal?

+1

Why does it seem that the internet is against so much of popular music? Sure, you could do better than Linkin Park, but we're only bothered because they're always on the radio and are so popular. Can you imagine how many bands sound like these guys...and didn't get signed? Heck, I bet Linkin Park inspired a few of them themselves.

+1

lol never noticed this

lol I never cared.

i forgot linkin park sucks

-3

Also http://www.hometracked.com/2007/05/29/all-linkin-park-songs-look-the-same/

Damn, those songs really are essentially the same. I can't believe I never noticed that before. Way to be lazy, LP.

+2

Those emos run out of ideas lol

-1

Wow i never noticed that and i'm a huge linkin park fan (pre-minutes to midnight)

Ditto.... but I noticed.

MIND BLOWING

So are we voting on the site's joke or linkin park? Because there's a lot people babbling about their votes on the latter, and very few addressing the "lol stealing from self"

+3

Reason #454 why Linkin Park sucks big floppy donkey dick!

-1

Never gonna give you up

+3

F*ck a Linkin Park

-1

the nickelback one is better

+1

The two together make a pretty awesome song, imho.

+4

5 for a mix that actual sounds good. -2 for speeding up Pushing Me Away and slowing down Numb to make your point.

+2

yeah, obvious tempo changes to prove your point is a dick move.

+1

Sh*t people are stupid. SONG TEMPO == SONG STRUCTURE?!?!?! PROFIT!

damn. I kind of like them. this is pathetic.

-1

not only that but they all look the same too. check it out: http://www.hometracked.com/2007/05/29/all-linkin-park-songs-look-the-same/

my bad, i see now that SoupOfTheDay already posted this link.

+1

All their songs sound the same... you just noticed this?

isn't that their thing to remix every single one of their songs like 8000 times

Just shows how they suck, good catch, 5'd

+1

CRAAAAWWWLIIINNG IIIINNN MYYYYY KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN

+20

Darth Genitals Unite!

WTF Linkin Park is Gay! To make this YTMND you would have to LISTEN to them! YOU....ARE....GAY!

-1

This ytmnd sucks more then the band it's trying to make fun of.

-1

lol I like Linkin Park . (truthfully) here comes the down votes X_x

+5

I applaud you for your courage Earthworm, standing up for what you believe in takes a lot of courage, especially when what you believe in is laughed upon by the majority of people on this site. I personally could care less what people think about Linkin Park, I just hate when they make baseless claims like "OMG this LP song sounds like another LP song LOLZ!" I challenge any of these punks to listen to Minutes to Midnight and tell me any of it sounds like Hybrid Theory or Meteora.

+1

I actually like the song NUMB. It's good.

Two things:1) I don't think you would have +5 votes right now if you hadn't acknowledged how negatively most people respond to something like "lol I like Linkin Park". It made people think twice. 2)A lot of people say Linkin Park is emo; that's not exactly fair. Broadly, emo means music that causes emotions (i.e. all of it), and literally means a certain genre of music (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emo#Criticism), which linkin Park is not. If you don't like music with sad/negative themes, say that.

you slowed down numb to fit it. i played it on my itunes next to your recording

Linkin park = Nickelback = Sh*t

+1

It's like sh*t sh*tting sh*t.

+3

These wounds they will not heal. You spent a lot of time listening to LP.

+1

Well until Minutes to Midnight at least.

+2

Booyah!

All of their songs sound the same. Subtract 200 points from your pride and intellegence for just noticing that.

-2

Goddamn I love linkin logs

+6

They could produce a song with that beat and those chords 100 times and it would still Barack my socks.

Good mashup.

They just have a generic sound that makes every song of theirs seem like a direct rip of the one before it. Really, they aren't copying anything. They just suck.

I haven't heard one this good (bad) since Nickelback's infamous "How You Remind Me" + "Someday" mix. 5/5

+1

Dude...Animals?

Its Nickelback all over again TBH

+1

Well no sh*t... what do you expect from talentless hacks?

this band is sh*te

Everything up to Hybrid Theory was good...then it got pretty standard emo music. I still like Hybrid Theory, but this just proves that their music has degraded to me. Thanks for pointing this out man!

Yeah I can agree with you on that. I did enjoy HT, but every album after that was just meh....

-1

besides this, most music is sh*t these days, good day sir!

Some of their songs sound similar. What band doesn't have any songs that sound similar? You could do this for pretty much ANY artist in existence.

People are missing the point (and the site creator in a way). It's not about stealing it's about applying the same dub formula in every way, and changing the tempo really doesn't mean anything, as obviously you're not gonna have 2 songs of the exact same length, but the concept is that they have to same kind of parts in every single song at proportionally the same time for the same duration.

I hate it when people say that Linkin Park uses "formulas" to make their songs, like "First you have the one guy singing, and then a guy rapping followed by more singing, and then screaming!" I could pull up a list of any band and go, "Oh, first you have the verse followed by the chorus, and then another verse!"

next do DJ Tiesto. Left ear: OOONS OOONS OOONS TSH Right ear: OOONS OOONS OOONS TSH

I actually spent about 15 minutes trying to do this just now... I was gonna match up two different versions of Lethal Industry, but I didn't have the patience for it.

DO EASTSIDE BOYS NEXT!

K.

Yeah, originality seems to have fallen by the wayside

+1

Linkin Park is a sh*tty band with generic songs that all sound alike? You don't say!

http://www.hometracked.com/2007/05/29/all-linkin-park-songs-look-the-same/

Not only is it unimpressive in terms of how much it matches (which is not a whole lot), it's also not surprising that an artist might *gasp* have a particular style and so their songs might sound similar.

-1

I should post a bit more explanation of what I mean before I get flamed to hell and back. With the Nickelback match up, not only were chord progressions similar, but the beat matched up a whole lot better, as did the lyrics. For instance, you could sing one line of one song, then switch to the other song and sing a line. With this Linkin Park YTMND, the chorus, bridge, and verse all line up, but the pitch is way off (It hurt my brain to listen to this YTMND), and the lyrics don't match up to the point where

-1

you can effortlessly switch from one song to another without having to pick up in the middle of a line. That is all.

-1

Wow, you're way off.

boo. you slowed down numb to prove your point. also c*cks

-1

[4] Fer realzies Nicely synched BTW...Why are so many ppl butthurt?

theres nothing wrong with that. who are they gonna sue?

ISN'T THIS JUST ONE SONG

-1

That is an epic realization, but I'm not the least bit surprised, as if always knew.

It doesn't even matter that the pitch/speed has been changed - the chord progressions/structure of the song is EXACTLY the same - I bet you could do this with tons of other combinations of their songs.

-1

i heard they both fit with Darkwing Duck too

+2

Finally some one points this out here. Thnak you

Linkin Park f*cking sucks

+1

Recycling saves our planet... but f*ggotry doesn't. Congrates Linkin Park on your epic win/fail.

+1

left speaker (numb) is slowed down to match the left speaker (pushing away).. 4 for conspiracy

wow i f*cked that comment up.. upgraded to 5

+1

holy crap a band sounds like itself! that never happens...

+3

You just turned my brain into sh*t... congrats...

i said they pretty much reused their beats to their crappy fan base at my school...hah now i more proof

-1

You realize your name reused vowels and therefor is crappy as well?

-1

It actually sounds pretty awesome. i've never noticed it either, and i've been a huge LP fan for a while now (minutes to midnight blows :[ )

+1

oh, and both songs are altered to fit this, so i mean...

-3

im taking the song for a screenshot fanboy lawling site.

After seeing Projekt Revolution 2008 in Mansfield last night, I am militantly downvoting any comment and anything that speaks ill of Linkin park or any band associated with Projekt Revolution this year. I don't give a damn if it's an opinion, i'm effin downvoting you.

-4

Drink a beer you homo.

+4

psssst...c'mere.....pssst.......Linkin Park sucks.......pass it on....

+5

Psst... Linkin Park has sucked since 2000

+2

pssst....more like....since always....

+1

those two songs are very similar!

typical pussy rock dogsh*t

-1

This man speaks the truth

-1

Reminds me of that old Nickelback sound clip. Both bands are sh*t.

-1

I've thought this for ages, however - they have still done some good tunes. People just hate on them for the sake of it. BTW your all c*nts

-1

-1

wtf? I dun get it???

wow top viewed again?

These songs don't sound identical. Don't see what the big deal is.

Thats gonna be one long court battle...

very well could be, CCR's record company sued John Fogerty over a song on one of his solo albums sounding "Too close" to a CCR song that he wrote... doesn't Michael Jackson own the Beatles? f*cking stupid industry

-1

Dude I've known about this... really, they're not a band. Their lead was referred to them by a record executive, and every other album is a remix or a live something or other... and who makes an album live from Texas?

+1

That's partly true, Chester was mentioned to the band by Warner but he had to go in and audition just like everyone else. The rest of the band all knew each other back from Xero, when Mark Wakefield was still the lead singer. Also, they didn't make a remix album after Minutes To Midnight, although performing collaborations on other artists' albums (Young Buck, Busta Rhymes). There most likely won't be a remix album since they've stated they're gonna start recording the new album after PR 08 of this year.

Stupid emo band is stupid

-1

OLD. Why is this top viewed again?

-1

Because everyone on YTMND is retarded.

+2

rehash

That it quite hilarious actually. Not exactly a fan, but its easy to see the humor in it.

-1

You did something to the left song, his voice doesn't sound like it should. He sounds more gay normally haha

+2

The Earth ran out of original music circa 1985.

wait wait wait....are you guys selling penis mightiers?

-1

Artists (Mostly rap artist) rehash or retool beats from previous songs and put new lyrics on them. I noticed you needed to speed up Pushing Me Away, and slow down Numb, just to make them sync properly. Yes, they are very similar almost to the point of being identical, but that doesn't mean you can't make a song sound different by layering old and new beats with new lyrics to make a new sound. While this was pretty perceptive, I don't feel like there's too much to read into here.

I voted 2 only because I haven't seen anyone vote 2 yet.

+1

Who still listens to Linkin Park?

oh snaps they pulled a nickelback

-1

no one is as bad as nickelback. shut up.

+1

aha

All linkin park songs are the same. They are an indisputably sh*tty band. It's not so bad hearing it for the first time though.

you fail, please try again ^_^

+1

And they're still awesome.

+1

if you honestly believe that most music played today is not stolen from you are sadly mistaken. There's something in music called chord progressions. Most songs are made of chord progressions in fours. Therefore, it's really hard these days to make a new and original chord progression that sounds nice. If you don't believe me then listen to these songs and tell me if they don't sound similar: Wonderwall, Mad World, Dream On, Boulevard of Broken Dreams. Also Pachelbel's Canon rant anyone?

also on that note, the only originality of music today is how the music is done (meaning instruments/solos/timing) not which chords it uses.

listen to the two songs seperatly, when you play them at the same time, they sound similar... but it isnt the same music.

fanboy

-2

everyone knows this, but good job putting them together.

-1

I was shown this back in 2005, before ytmnd existed...and sh*t's not funny at all. Try putting in Soulja Boy Crank Dat on the background and I can give it a better score.

Don't listen to the Ramones.

so sped up/slowed down to keep up to itself