Iowa was pretty much given to f*ckabee, that was a given. Actually Iowa proved that RP is not %1 or %3 material, he's double-digit material. If anything Iowa is a victory. Also, enjoy your fascism.

-12 [show comment][hide comment]

Also, he beat rudy what does that tell you?

-8

Agreed. Iowa is heavily, heavily fundamentalist. Also, the future President has only taken the Iowa caucus twice, ever. All the smart people are watching the New Hampshire primary.

-10 [show comment][hide comment]

Your parade of delusion has some marvelous floats. Great site. I lol'd.

+1

"Also, he beat rudy what does that tell you?" - Rudy is hated more and more every day and didnt even campaign there. and Paul still lost to Fred Thompson who was asleep around 90% of the time.

+21

Somehow Paul in this photo reminds me of Smeagol.

+5

i knew it! Paul lost! hes only popular on the internets and w/ teenagers! and about 30% of teens and fat lards on the computer vote anyways; he was after the wrong crowd..........

+2

This is a long comment. This long comment probably at first makes you think of how much politics makes people type in long comments. Its funny how these people probably say "gtfo f*g" and stuff regularly but when politics comes up they make this long comment. It is so long that it makes you think you want to write an opinion about this long comment with just as long of a comment. bla bla politics bla bla bush bla bla tax cuts either way it will make you feel smart.

+2

Screw Ron Paul. Once he dug into the files and revealed 9/11 was caused be terrorists anyway, what then? You think he could run a country? No way.

-5

^ Have you seen what he up against?

-1

Obama is going to win despite what anyone in america votes (because it doesn;t really matter we haven't had a say in the goverment in YEARS) then they possibly might even assassinate him for the second Catostrophic event. Mark my words. If it comes true they'll do a f*cking A&E show on me. BTW has anyone noticed how EVERY talk show and EVERY tv show and EVERY website has pics of Obama splattered all over them? You;re all f*cking brainwashed. Simple minded fools.

-3

Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics makes me SO horny. Politics

Wow he beat rudy, a guy who didnt do anything to run in iowa, great job. Ron Paul is a retard who can't run a country.

-1

1. Rudy was in Iowa for 57 or so days. 2. Ron Paul really did not campaign in Iowa that much. He, his staffers and other supporters wrote that state off.

ROMNEY FOR VICE PRESIDENT

"Ron Paul is a retard who can't run a country." The President does not run the country. We don't live in a dictatorship.

5'd 5'd 5'd 5'd 5'd

-1

I love Ron Paul and I thought this YTMND was funny. Plus any publicity is good publicity for him.

1'ed. And a nsfw for good measure.

-1

PS more people will negative this comment than there will be delegates for Ron Paul

+35

this

-6

cant find the egg inside me ! (http://impregnant.ytmnd.com/)

+2

-1

5'd, they won't let him attend debates no haha

+2

because it's f*ckin fox news and they're afraid

+1

"Also, he beat rudy what does that tell you?" That Rudy didn't even campaign in Iowa. Congrats, Paulie beat a guy who didn't even want to run in Iowa.

McCain barely campaigned in Iowa. This tells me that Ron Paul got _beat_ by a guy who has invested little time in Iowa.

Rudy was in Iowa 57 days.

Seriously, was anyone expecting Ron Paul's Internet presence to result in a win? I figured it was common knowledge that Ron Paul was the Snakes on a Plane of presidential candidates.

+21

Is Obama the Blasphemy... Madness of presidential candidates?

-3

everyone vote depending on loyalty to memes!

+4

Mudclip for bababooey 08

-2

Like anyone in Iowa has a computer anyway....

+3

People in Iowa: WE WANT MORE CORN SUBSIDIES!!

+2

Yes, because he who wins the Iowa caucus will automatically win the general election.

+10

exactly.

+2

Actually, there have only been two presidential cannidates to have ever won the Iowa presidential cacuaus that have ever won the presidency and the only non-encumbant was GWB in 2000. In fact Ronald Regan lost the Iowa cacaus to GHB back in 1980 and GHB did not win the Iowa cacaus when he ran in 1988.

-3

^excellent use of search engines! also, it seems to me that you should be voting for a candidate that supports more education funding, because you are are an ass. (yeah i know, i didnt really know where to go with that joke)

-1

more educational funding doesn't stop people from being lazy

-1

hooker teachers

Another thing more funding doesn't stop is bureaucratic waste...

*sigh* YTMND is full of retards. Enjoy your communist-style facism, f*ggots.

-12 [show comment][hide comment]

Thanks, doctor.

-1

communist-style facism? true communism = far left. fascism = far right. once you realize that, you will be allowed to analyze anything politically. until then, you lose.

+2

YTMND should be a political party. What would our animal be?

+4

the blue footed booby

-1

Yes, because the best way to analyze political spectrum's is by putting them on a line...

+3

"communist-style facism? true communism = far left. fascism = far right. once you realize that, you will be allowed to analyze anything politically. until then, you lose." Actually, they're flip sides of the same coin. Hitler and Stalin were best friends. The communists even helped out the Nazis to win in Germany, before Hitler turned on them.

-1

NEDM kitty for the YTMND mascot

+++++++++++++++++

maddogsoldier, Russian communism is not true communism, but rather totalitarianism. Not everyone was equal in Russian communism, some were more equal than others (to quote Animal Farm). True communism boasts equality for all. No one was equal to Stalin, so it wasn't technically communism.

I've heard this argument before. Here's why I disagree: First, you are aware that the Soviet Union is not the only nation that attempted communism or used communist rhetoric. Be aware that Red China under Mao's revolution made many of the same claims you did about Russia. The result? A similar, but in many ways, worse nation than Soviet Russia. Cuba. Cuba had its own communist revolution, spouting much of the rhetoric of Lenin and Marx, but it grew into a despotic nation.

The hard leftists who go there and claim that it is a great place are sent to the places where all the other western tourists go, namely, the best parts. Cambodia's Khmer Rouge was said to have much promise when it started. It even received blessings from Noam Chomsky. The result? One of the world's grossest violators of human rights in the history of humanity. Other nations have tried similar experiments, using Marxist/Leninist rhetoric, with marginal results at best.

and Kudos for Conine.

GG Ron Paul.

-2

http://digg.com/comedy/Iowowned_A_Ron_Paul_Story

-19 [show comment][hide comment]

nice... you attempt to pull a HTPAT

-3 [show comment][hide comment]

Way to suck your own dick.

+4

That's the only way you can get top viewed, by being a f*ggot and having 11 f*cking random idiots "Digg" this f*cking turd

11 random idiots, or 11 not-so-random sock puppets?

-1

You get a - for every dig on that. You are at 15 digs so -15

-1

Obama! WOO!

+6

Are people on ytmnd really going to throw punches at Ron Paul, the only candidate who truly understands our current economic crisis, our need to leave Iraq, and our rights and freedoms provided by the Constitution? After plenty of research I am convinced that every American citizen with a sound mind wants Ron Paul to win whether they know it or not. Please weigh your options and become well informed before you vote!

-3

yeah cause ytmnd is full of communists and neo-cons. (Also known as retards)

-3 [show comment][hide comment]

Ahahahaha, suck it Paulistas, cry into your Cheetos some more.

+4

Enjoy your Fascism and theocracy.

-4 [show comment][hide comment]

So....if anyone but Ron Paul wins the presidency, the result will be fascism? You're a fool. Listen to yourself.

+6

Theocracy? Are you f*cking retarded? "Religious morality will always inform the voting choices of Americans of all faiths," he writes. "...The collectivist left is threatened by strong religious institutions, because it wants an ever-growing federal government to serve as the unchallenged authority in our society.... So the real motivation behind the insistence on a separation of church and state is not based on respect for the First amendment, but rather on a desire to diminish the influence

+4

of religious conservatives at the ballot box." Ron Paul's own words. Let's compare those words to some choice selections from the U.S. Consitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion; ...no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

+4

Wanna talk about fascism? http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.4379: Paul attempted remove protections from arbitrary local and state action against individual liberties with this laughable piece of legislation. Real freedom-loving guy.

+3

Actually most of the candidates are just puppets for the shadow elite that want to bring fascism to this country. They also own the mainstream media, which is why Ron Paul doesn't get the attention he deserves. Most of what they focus on is the candidates they want to sear into your mind. They say jump and you say how high. Brainwashed slaves. Educate yourselves.

-2

Proof that every single candidate other than Ron Paul is as you described? Maybe we're not the only ones who need education...

+1

Sorry guys... i can't find my monocle... I guess i'll just sit this one out

+5

considering http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.4379 tries to LIMIT the jurisdiction of the supreme court, and leave decisions up to the local governments, where they should be...I'd say that is freedom loving.

-1

Yeah, it leaves local and state courts free to impose restrictions on birth control, sexuality, and integration. Which is exactly what the supporters of the bill wanted.

I trust the local and state officials to make the decisions regarding their community moreso than the overarching federal govt. If those said officals abuse their power in regards to those topics, make unpopular restrictions, etc...they would get voted out where need be. Power in the hands of the people, where it should be.

That's fine, but there needs to be some oversight at the national level. You don't have to dig very deep to find examples of arbitrary and repressive state and local actions. Just look at Jim Crow laws.

^Which disappeared over 40 years ago....

+1

What, you think there aren't states and localities that wouldn't love to revive them? You're deluded.

-1

I think that it is insane to imply that a state nowadays would even dream of implementing anything like Jim Crow laws. Between then and now, racist group ideology and participation has steadily declined. The Ku Klux Klan membership has shrunken to negligible numbers. You will find more people to assemble for 'Magic: The Gathering'. In the modern day environment, it would be practically impossible to do such a thing when one takes into consideration the enormously bad press that the state would receive.

+1

Not to mention, the hideously negative economic effects that would likely occur, due to worldwide resentment. A more likely scenario would be that California legalizes all drug use, or at worst, some state like Alabama would allow for religious displays at public schools.

+1

Exactly madDogSol...though I don't know about ALL drug use, but I could see marijuana legalized in CA.

-5 for the US being gay and making a big deal about sh*t like that +2 for simple plan

-5

+5 because it was 1'd by a Canadian who likes Simple Plan.

If the US is gay, then Canada is transvestite

+1

Iowa sux ne ways

+2

Hahahaha

-1

haha, awesome. republicans are horrible, but ron paul is a real lunatic among them. I actually thought he was okay at first glance, but there was a huge discussion online where people started pulling skeletons out of the closet. racist remarks, anti-semitism, paranoia, suicidal economic beliefs, theocratic leanings, unusable social policy. The veneer of a messianic, gentle conservative evaporated after only 400 or so posts worth of collective research

-3

He has, on his campaign website, the claim that the United Nations is attempting to levy a direct tax on people. This is absolutely hyperbole demagoguery at the highest degree. No sane person can claim that a non-governmental TREATY organization has the authority or ever will have the authority to claim taxes from member nations. Not even the European Union can manage this, and it's semi-governmental. Ron Paul is a real conspiracy nutjob.

And this gem: The tired assertion of a separation of church and state has no historical or constitutional basis. Neither the language of the Constitution itself nor the legislative history reveals any mention of such separation. In fact, the authors of the First amendment- Fisher Ames and Elbridge Gerry- and the rest of the founders routinely referred to Almighty God in our founding documents. It is only in the last 50 years that the federal courts have perverted the meaning of the amend

-2

ment and sought to unlawfully restrict religious expression. We cannot continue to permit our Constitution and our rich religious institutions to be degraded by profound misinterpretations of the Bill of Rights.

-2

Also, check out which candidate the mentalcases on stormfront.org have a f*cking boner for. You guessed: Ron Paul.

-1

Just as a clarification, Mast: EU Member States pay loads of tax to the EU, and it's not really semi-governmental, it's a supranational government to which Members give up their sovereignty - EU Directives are indirectly totally binding.

-1

Members don't pay a tax to the EU, they pay a membership fee. The EU has no right to assert taxes over the membership countries. They don't "give up" sovereignty, it's more as in sharing sovereignty.

The only difference between a tax and a membership fee is the name. They both do the same thing, get your moneys.

ron paul supporters are almost entirely white males. That sort of narrow appeal alone sets off immediate alarm bells.

+3

^ White people are evil incarnate. They should all be burned alive at the stake.

+1

"The veneer of a messianic, gentle conservative evaporated after only 400 or so posts worth of collective research" Good to see that you are doing so much careful research from blog posts. Are you working on your university grant?

+1

Obama has my vote

-2

"The Iowa caucus on January 3rd will be a tough start for Paul. He hasn’t spent that much time in Iowa and may not have the organization that Romney does to win the caucus. Placing in the top five is all that is needed there. " The fact that Ron paul, who was predicted to be a 1%, or at most 3% canidate, managed to pull 10% in that hell hole proves that we do indeed have power. also, like rafe said, Iowa is full of Fundies (retards) and no president (save 2) have EVER won the iowa caucuses.

-3

also, like rafe said, Iowa is full of Fundies (retards) and no president (save 2) have EVER won the iowa caucuses. Iowa DOES NOT decide the rest of the race. So dont celebrate too soon Neo-Con Retards, this isn't over yet. Not in the least bit.

-2

Ron Paul is good fun. All his madcap rants are quality entertainment. There isn't a single candidate on the ballot on either side that's worth a f*ck. I might as well be entertained while the nation goes to sh*t.

-1

I don't actually HATE Ron Paul, I just get a kick out of teasing his supporters since they take it so seriously, and think spamming Youtube threads with "RON PAUL 08" and flaming people who disagree as fascists, commies or retards is how you run a successful grassroots campaign.

+2

^ you sound like a really cool guy with places to go and people to see

http://www.usadaily.com/article.cfm?articleID=207908

-2

Keep ytmnd from being a political platform k thx bye

+1

too late for that

well you're not helping any . . .

-1

no, k? "YTMND is a site created for the purpose of furthering the creativity of its users. It stems from an idea that, using sound, and image, and some text, the users can convey a point, funny, POLITICAL, or otherwise, to the general media. "

^k but it has to be funny in order for it to count and its not funny

uh uh. Notice the 'or' part of the clause, which means that it can be just one of the above, not all of the above

As a Hillary supporter, this was a piece of news that really cheered me up (not that I dislike Obama or Edwards).

-4

Me too!

Didn't hillary lose in iowa? Oh, and Hillary = Bush with a sex change, a different name, and running under another ticket.

+3

NO DON'T SAY THAT! IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT HILLARY, YOU HATE WOMEN!!

vote for ron paul, he's not hilary

Forget the politics. This is just good YTMND.

10% isn't that bad considering where he was coming from. 4000 votes away

-1

i just want ice cream

Then buy some, you lazy fück.

Khan Paul 08

just between you and me... I heard the J-E-W-S suppressed the real results!

PHAIL on so many levels -*ONE* for being a republican scumbag and proving YTMND is mostly run by some Republican forum where this is actually funny and hotlinked, *TWO* for viewing an obvious victory (keeping 10%) from the underdog as a failure, *THREE* for making a SH*T ytmnd and STEALING the number one spot from me. You f*cking suck. Vote Ron Paul.

+4

Paul has a f*ckload of money. Sorry, that doesnt make him any more of an underdog than say, Thompson or McCain at this point. If thats the best the PaulieWannaCrackers can do, you're toast. The ratio of money Paul has earned/spent to actual votes brought out tells the whole story.

A story thats not worth top viewed I can tell you that sir. I don't give a sh*t. I'm a democrat anyways

Yeah. This is why I registered republican, not to vote for RP but to vote against douche bags like Mitt, Guliani and Mccain. People don't look farther than the next meal ticket or think like everyone else. If Clinton, Edwards, or Obama win it doesn't matter because they are all basically the same... The republicans however (including Huck) are pure evil except for RP. That is why you need to vote for him. So that in case a republican does win we won't be up sh*t creek again.

-1

"If thats the best the PaulieWannaCrackers can do" OMG!!! You R soooo clehvur!!

-3

Apt > Clever

tell me sum MOAR FUNNYJOKES

-2

Cerebral Paulsie is a terrible affliction

+1

what comedy club do you perform at? I bet you just kill audiences with those puns.

-1

Voting Ron Paul won't do a thing cause he probably is a phony set to make truth seekers look bad and elections are rigged anyway. Go America, the Land of the Slaves and the Home of the Blissfully Ignorant!

-2

%10 is actually pretty damn strong considering it's A) Iowa. B) He's being ignored by mainstream media. C) It's f*cking Iowa.

+7

C*CK F*G LOLZ, AMERIKA IS FOR TERRORISTS!!

-2

Yes... YES!!

-1

YES FOR HUCKABEE 08' WOOHOOO!

-1

10% is rather good for the little midget that could.

-1

Okay....... i'm canadian. Don't care

DIE

-3

Then....... shut up.

-1

Popularity polls normally do not reflect who actually wins the primary.

-1

I don't care as long as Romney and Giuliani loses. k, thx.

-1

Bill Clinton got 3% in Iowa when he ran.

-1

"i knew it! Paul lost! hes only popular on the internets and w/ teenagers!" You have to be 18 for your vote to count in the caucus. So, if he got 10%, then it's obviously not just teenagers. Duncan Hunter lost, Ron Paul didn't.

-1

Great music.

-1

5 even though you used that horrible song.

-2

I don't get it, someone care to explain? Lots of people didn't win is there something especially funny about Ron Paul losing?

bEcAuSe iT's tEh Ron PaUL ReVolUtIoN!!!111!!!11

-1

^ HUCKABEE 08'!

F*ckabee Huckabee

^ Roundhouse kick for you

flawless victory.

-1

AHAHAHAHAHAH F*CK RON PAUL

HUCKABEE 08'!

-1

ZOMG CHUCK NORRIS! I SHOULD VOTE HUCKABEE

You better, unless you want a roundhouse kick to the head

I've never been prouder to be American.

-1

what you morons dont get is that not even RP supporters expected him to win this. seriously, other than it being the first primary...who the f*ck cares about a bunch of farmers in iowa? remake this ytmnd if he gets a lot less votes in total than expected and it'll actually be relevant

-1

The point the f*ggots on ytmnd don't seem to realize is that even RP supporters KNEW Iowa was not going to be Ron Paul's. the goal wasn't to win Iowa (a first state victory is impossible. Only two presidents have EVER won iowa in the primaries.), but rather to show America that support for Ron Paul WAS there. that Ron Paul IS double digit material instead of simply a "second tier canidiate", and we succeeded by placing top five.

+3

THE 'MURRICAN PEOPLE WANT MOAR FLAPJACKS!!

-1

I'm a Ron Paul fan, but the clever use of OVER in the ron paul revolution gives this site 5

-1

Ron Paul is a great man. Iowa is a fundie state. I didn't expect him to win there or even do well. He was polling lower there than how things turned out, so I am pleased with that. New Hampshire is much more libertarian and packed with Independents. If Paul doesn't win there then I would be very concerned, but Iowa? ......

+2

Sir, you are a hero for making this ytmnd. Ron Paul and his paulbots can kiss my government loving ass.

-4

With a name like "moran" well, that's sort of what I'd expect.

-1

"my government loving ass." Which receives 'service' from the Government, thrusting ONLY slowly in, using plenty of KY jelly...

OVER

-2

Wow did Rudy Guliani drop out yet then?

-1

no. But Joe Biden did. oh well, who cares.

-1

He was only Biden his time...

lol @ all the ron paul anus lickers being so butthurt. I hope he loses so all of you will finally shut the f*ck up about him.

Funny stuff. I remember the 7th grade...

It's weird that Ron Paul supporters only talk about "fascism" in the context of having to pay taxes. I never hear them mention Guantanomo Bay, the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the Bush "administration's" endorsement of waterboarding, the Patriot Act, or wiretapping. Though I know why-a solid majority don't know what the f*ck they're talking about, and the rest are xenophobes (see stormfront.org) and/or whiny economic (but not civil) libertarians who don't want to pay taxes. F*ck off, morons.

-2

actually we do talk about those. Lurk Moar

-1

Uhh, Ron Paul is the ONLY, ONLY republican candidate who has promised to undo the abuses under the patriot act, warrantless wiretapping et. al. I hate it when people fail to properly research something, form a strong opinion about it, and then tell people who actually bothered to spend a few minutes researching the candidate to "f*ck of morons". Of course, this perfectly describes the average voter.

-1

And oh boy so ron paul didn't return the money the owner of stormfront donated to him, instead spending it so they couldn't use it for anything else. OH NOES HES EBIL AND WASIST!

-1

That person obviously expected paul to do somthing for him because he donated to paul. This is the way normal, Corporate-Based politics works. You donate money and in return the canidate supports your values.

-1

In grassroots campaigning, it works the other way around. You donate to a candidate BECAUSE they support your views (or at least the ones you find most important) and your cause. StormFront failed to realise this and got owned as a result.

-1

Think of it this way: Your a candidate for the office of (ANYTHING), and someone from stormfront gives you money, expecting to support their views. Well obviously you don't support their veiws, so what is worse? To pander to the common media idiot and give the money back to them so they can use it to... fund another candidate, fund a hate rally, or worse yet, fund a hate crime? OR.... Spend the money, so that way you use it for your own cause and they cant use it for anything, thus screwing them over?

-1

actually kindpastor: hes the only candidate IN THE ENTIRE RACE who has promised to undo the abuses under the patriot act, warrant-less wiretapping et. al.

Ron Paul's not racist? What would you call this remark, then: "If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be." Ron Paul's own words. Look into it.

-1

Anyway, I said Ron Paul supporters, not Ron Paul. There wasn't a mention of the Military Commissions Act or the Patriot Act or waterboarding by any of you assclowns until I brought it up. Previously all you said was "fascism" and "taxes" and "Hilary Clinton is a man!" Idiots.

Ryla, you're just arguing with yourself now.

+1

"Spend the money, so that way you use it for your own cause and they cant use it for anything, thus screwing them over?" Are you that out of touch with reality? Accepting money from an organization is an endorsement of what that group stands for. Period.

The ACLU has accepted money from a variety of racist organizations, like neo-nazis, KKK, etc., to defend themselves against hysterical idiots like you. Right wingers have rights too.

-1

^Your point is? Did I ever say racists didn't have a right to spout off their nonsense? The ACLU exists to defend people's constitutional rights. There's no parallel between them accepting money from the klan (or whoever) to defend their first amendment rights, and the Ron Paul campaign accepting money from them. Donations are made with the understanding that the candidate will advance that group's agenda.

+1

whats the starting wage for a full time Paultard?

All you can eat cookies. They were passing 'em out on my campus last semester.

Oh, ok. I forgot about the double standard. It's only okay when left wing organizations do these kind of things. forgive me.

+1

I just explained the difference, douche. But apparently it's in one ear and out the other with you. I'm out. Peace.

-1

What major difference? The ACLU fights for the civil liberties and religious liberties of all, so does Ron Paul. All you spoke of were mere technicalities.

+1

John Stuart Mill's harm principle: That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not sufficient warrant. I vote for the guy who will abide the most by this principle.

-1

lol at all the Ron Paul Asshats who can't take a joke.

-3

meh

+1

Oh well. We can't all win. lol

-2

thank god, I was getting sick of the pro-Ron Paul ytmnds. Wake up people, the guy's a bigger nutcase than Nader.

-2

MAINSTREAM CANDIDATES 08' WOOHOOO!

Hill-dawg and Edwards got owned harderer. Nobody in their right (or left) mind would elect Ron Paul.

-2

No one in their right mind would use fake words like 'harderer'

lol. I love how Rondroids foam at the mouth whenever someone says something bad about their dear dr. Awesome site.

+2

I support Ron Paul, but I have to say that changing the campaign slogan so that it "over" is highlighted instead of "love" was pretty clever.

+2

BUSH-CHENEY '08 YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO

+1

BUSINESS AS USUAL 08'!

His supporters were too busy flooding Internet polls to go out and vote.

+2

Haha, only people who were beaten or abandoned by their parents like Ron Paul.

+3

Does that mean you support him?

-1

ooooooo I dont think he'll ever recover from that burn!!!! Real mature

Yeah, and his post was a bastion of intellect and wisdom.

HAY GUYZ HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT THIS COOL THING CALLED DA GOLD STANDURD??????? Yeah, RP can eat a bag of dicks for all I care. Go Obama!

-2

Hahaha, looks like a Rondroid tried to downvote my comment.

-2

HUCKABEE 08' WOOOHOOO!

-1

Roundhouse kicks for downvoters

Notice you don't see Giuliani anywhere on that list, do you? That because he came in at 2%

-1

LOL! Seriously though we don't want this guy to be president. It may be funny on the interwebs to joke about such things, but in all honesty I believe this guy would have the US bankrupt while drawing up plans for World War 3 by the second year of his term. Proposals to eliminate the IRS etctera sound good on paper but taxes are necessary to survival - the reason the Soviet Union collapsed was because it went bankrupt. The government needs money, plain and simple.

What we need to do is elect a leader who realizes this but at the same time takes the majority of it from the people who have the most instead of the least (i.e. the rich). The Bush admin has cut the government's revenue almost by ¾ during his 8 horrid years in office and has put just about all the money the government did make into a pointless desert war. What the country needs is to start putting that money back into domestic programs, instead of basically capturing land for Halliburton to make money.

As for withdrawl from the UN, there'd be no quicker way to start World War 3, especially with the deteriorating relationship between Russia and the US. Russia's increasing strength, influence, and seeming return to totalitarian government, whether we like it or not, is a threat. We need to deal with it the way Regan and others did during the 80s - with tactics and strategy, rather than bullish idealism. Diplomacy is part of strategy. Nobody wants to get nuked, and that's why the UN exists.

The United Nations is filled with weasels and third world dictators.

-4

Where did you get your PhD, madDog?

-2

i got it at Screw U

-2

Oh, look: http://tinyurl.com/4sppa

Oh, I'm sorry, maybe the U.N. actually IS good: http://tinyurl.com/2mpuc8

Without the income tax the federal government would have as much income as in 2000. I'm sure he's drawing up plans for WWIII right now. Becuause, that's totally consistent with his voting record and policy.

freerepublic is thataway, so you can scream off some far-right rhetoric

Really? They hate Ron Paul over there, but thanks for playing.

I knew it all along, paul is for losers

-2

Suggestion: Change the flag to a "Hang in there, Kitty" poster.

http://myex.ath.cx/?id=47e2c53e

-1

ytmnd is full of idiots. 10% is a lot for a guy who doesn't even get TV time except when they're trying to smear him. This is just the beginning.

-3

He won't even come close to the nomination, then he'll switch to a third party so he can get on the ballet only to lose.

Umm, he beat Rudy Guiliani. He also was only like 2,000 to 3,000 votes away from being in 3rd place. By the way, his caucus results were in line with his straw poll results for the same state. And guess what about his new hampshire straw poll results, he won, overwhelmingly. So look for a big win in NH. This site sucks my ass.

Rudy didnt even run in Iowa becuase of the Evangelical Christians, Ron did.... of course he did you f*cknut

-1

NH is probably the most libertarian state in the country and he wont even win there. Chinese Democracy is more likely to hit stores before Paul picks up a victory anywhere.

-1

Actually Rudy visited Iowa a lot more than Paul did. EVERYTHING in iowa was on the ground grassroots efforts, nothing actually endorsed by the Campaign itself.

rudy was there for 58 days

rudy is officially a f*ck-up candidate. There's no way he'll win the Republican nomination. He blows off all the important caucuses/primaries thinking he'll scoop up the big ones, something that has yet to occur in modern history :-/

-1

NH Rudy came in 4th with Ron in 5th. so put that in your pipe and smoke it. Also Rudy barely spent any money there. His campaign strategy is focused in other states like Florida.

lonely man theme from hulk would of been better.

awesome. glad to see he got pwned. now if only his annoying supporters would take the hint and stfu about him.

-3

Maybe you should take the hint and vote for him. Unless you want the values your country was founded on to be thrown away, then by all means vote for any one of the other candidates.

I lol'd even though Ron's better than those other douchebags.

clever

-3

That's so sad.

-2

OMG IT'S A SCAM THE CAUCUS WAS RIGGED BY BIG GOVERNMENT

-2

BUSINESS AS USUAL 08'!

+2

Ron had no chance to survive make your time, hahaha

-1

:'( But I still lawld

-1

1'd for submitting to digg.

5'd, awesome. Take that, Paul freaks...

-2

MAINSTREAM CANDIDATES 08'!

Blow that sh*t out your ass.