no thanx

+1

you prefer authoritarianism. ok then.

-9

mariostar is a c*ckf*g.

Maybe he just isn't going to vote for a republican.

+1

pendejo(s).

-3

The colors should better represent his sexuality; MAKE IT A RAINBOW.

-2

RON PAUL SUXORZ. EVEN ANONYMOUS ONLY DONATED $0.67!

-9 [show comment][hide comment]

wow dasuber-whatever. that's like saying "if you didn't vote for bush you voted for the terrorists". mentalities like this further cement my hatred of the republican party. oh, and f*ck ron paul.

-4

at least Mario Star is polite.

-2

i'm a c*ckf*g? self-sponsorship, now that's f*ggish behavior. ;)

+4

sex with ron paul

+6

vote KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN PAUL 2008

+8

RP 2008

+4

Ron Pauls ideology seems flawed to me... I dont understand what makes people so fascinated with him. Still, he's a better candidate than Hillary or Obama, lol

I actually like Bill Richardson the best out of every candidate, however the problem is from the looks of the polls hes probably not going to win.

Who the f*ck is ron paul?

Well... Here is the deal. If Clinton, Obama, or Edwards get elected we won't be in bad shape, but if Mitt, Huck, or Guliani get elected then were up sh*t creek! Thats why I'm voting for RP in the primaries. Mostly because he's the only republican thats not if a douche. If he wins the primaries but doesn't win the main election. No big whoop, but if Mitt, Huck, or Guli win then you know what they are going to do. Pretty much what GWB did.

+1

Secondly, don't you realize that Ron Paul is the only cannidate that voted against the war in Iraq and the PATRIOT Act? Have you been flying lately? I'm sure the Patriot act is the biggest impact on all our lives. I don't give a sh*t who you are, but that bill was pure evil in its intentions and applications. So get a bit pragmatic and realize what is going on.

Let me put this straight: Social issues > Economics. Always more important. And by social issues I mean liberal social issues, for me at least. Ron Paul is pretty much neutral on all social issues, so hes kinda stagnant to me. Hillary and Obama, and well any of the other Democrats I can think of, will make us look better to the rest of the world. Ron Paul will make us look better foreign policy-wise, but his economics will send us back to the 19th-century.

-1

Barack Obama N*GG*!

+2

I know believe Borack Obama is going to win this election even if the whole poulation of the U.S. votes for Ron Paul.

+1

Just say YES to Liberty!

+1

I'll just say NO to crackpots like Ron Paul!

-7

I'll say no to humorless cranks like HerbSewell.

+1

just say yes to EPIC freedom, http://tropicalfreedom.ytmnd.com/

+1

^ retarded

sneaky, un-EPIC east german ^

You want epic? I'll give you EPIC: http://youtube.com/watch?v=EI_8a5DUaJY

Ron Paul a crackpot? I don't think so? Someone who will let dumbasses like them just mind their own business? I do think so.

-5

Epic? That's not reggae, man.

Reggae puts people to sleep

"European Liberals complain more about Israel than they do about Saudi Arabia!" There's nothing actually liberal about those people. They are a bunch of vicious political hacks who make every effort to silence the opposition, and arrogantly look down on those who differ. Thanks to those people, the word 'liberal' has come to mean the exact opposite of what it actually meant.

Wasted effort, this site is full of commies and zionists.

-12 [show comment][hide comment]

At first glance I thought you said combine

+8

Don't forget welfare moochers and politically correct crybabies

+5

and those sneaky east germans

+5

and jews

-1

Milton Friedman was a jew. I respect him. Ayn Rand was a jew turned atheist. Neither would dream of being state parasites.

-1

Wasted effort, this site is full of people who aren't paranoid about fair trade and international Jewish conspiracies.

+2

'fair trade' is a democrat platform

Way to go mariostar....

-1

I could be considered a Zionist in the fact that I have sympathy for Jews for having their relatively benign religion being plagiarized and spread all over the planet like cancers by Christians and Muslims only to be oppressed back by those cancerous offshoots. I also like how liberal Israel is and the fact they blow the f*ck out of sexist, homophobic Palestinians. I however DESPISE the Neo-Con Christian Zionists in the US government because they are only using Israel for a bullsh*t Jesus prophecy.

I am also fairly annoyed at the scum hypocritical liberals who hate Israel and support the Palestinians (and Muslims in general) who, while most are not Islamic terrorists, are pretty much as a rule homophobic for Islamic reasons and also the fact that they associate homosexuals with Israel and see them as traitors. The only exceptions to this are countries like Turkey, Lebanon, and some [other] Non-Arab Muslim countries. Sh*t, European Liberals complain more about Israel than they do about Saudi Arabia!

Sarcasm.. Learn it comment negativing idiot. Commies, Zionists, Jews alot of people lump them in the same category.... right? Learn to f*cking read before you accuse someone of racism.

"European Liberals complain more about Israel than they do about Saudi Arabia!" There's nothing actually liberal about those people. They are a bunch of vicious political hacks who make every effort to silence the opposition, and arrogantly look down on those who differ. Thanks to those people, the word 'liberal' has come to mean the exact opposite of what it actually meant.

JOHN CONNOR 2008!

-1

JON CARRIE '04, VOAT %

+7

Ron Paul for Liberty and freedom!

We'd certainly be free from any responsibility for the welfare of our fellow human beings.

As we should be.

+1

@CaribDevist - Have you donated to starving kids in Sudan latley?

What's ironic is that all the crybaby Europeans and Canadians like to accuse us of greed, due to the fact that our government donates far less per capita to 3rd world nations than their nations. The problem is, for them, is that Americans actually donate MORE per capita when private contributions are factored in. They make themselves look like self-righteous dicks for nothing.

Woot! I know the singer xD

+1

mastersitsu 2008

-1

VOAT FIEV FOR OBAMA

+2

LOL! Spoken like so many democrat supporters! (except those for Kucinich+Gravel)

Democrats are retarded. Enjoy your socialism->economic collapse and trampled rights...

-2

It seems like all the reasons I used to support democrats erode more and more. I at one time thought they were cool, because I thought they were the party of Cheech and Chong, Timothy Leary and Hunter S. Thompson. Now, it becomes more evident that they are really the party of the crabby old lady who always shows up at town hall to scream obscenities.

+2

CARRRRRRRRRIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

"Democrats are retarded. Enjoy your socialism->economic collapse and trampled rights..." Ah yes... for a candle burns, and tears roll down lady liberty's cheeks for the oppressed Swedes.

While I don't agree with 100% socialism saying it collapses economies is utterly retarded. Chile, Norway, Sweden, and others are thriving now. Granted it depends on the country, and fast implementing a Socialistic economy on par with those countries in the US might be a bad idea.

That retard isn't going to be the Republican candidate and everyone with at least half a brain knows it.

+4

The reason this "retard" isnt going to be the Republican cannidate is that everyone with at least half a brain isn't a registered republican

-2

f*ck ron paul. ^^

+3

stfu

+1

a candidate who is anti-choice on the abortion rights issue does not represent "freedom" and "liberty" - he wants the government controlling reproductive behavior. No thanks to the government in our bedrooms.

+1

So it is perfectly okay to murder babies?

-5 [show comment][hide comment]

He's been a doctor for like 50 years, and he's delivered over 4,000 babies. Furthermore, he was responsible for the legal rights that those unborn children had, which oddly, seem to dissappear the moment the word abortion is used. Long story short, he's not against abortion because he's against free choice or women's rights, but because from a biological standpoint, he beleives it is a loss of life, me and my biology degree are inclined to agree.

-2

"No thanks to the government in our bedrooms." Last time I checked, people weren't performing abortions in their own bedrooms, and it was hardly a private practice. It's simply mass-produced, socially-acceptable murder.

+7

I personally respect both sides of the issue, and find it difficult to firmly swing either way.

+7

You are entitled to your opinions and so is Ron Paul. It is just misleading to say he is the candidate for "freedom" and "liberty" when he wants to take legal rights away and have the government intrude into people's reproductive behavior, i.e. "the bedroom."

-1

chuft, he would NOT make abortion illegal. He would leave it up to the states to decide. PER THE CONSTITUTION.

Certain human rights cannot be trampled upon by the states, PER THE CONSTITUTION. Obviously he would not want to leave it to the states except as a means to an end, since it is a federal right at the moment.

-1

"chuft, he would NOT make abortion illegal. He would leave it up to the states to decide. PER THE CONSTITUTION." states are forced to follow the supreme law of the land, and the 9th amendment protects abortion rights (as ruled by the supreme court, the final arbiter AS PER THE CONSTITUTION). go support states' sovereignity on a neo-confederate forum.

-2

^ argument ad-hominem

Early term abortion is fine, but why do so many bitches wait until the baby's brain begins to develop? At that point it's murder - unless they have a serious health issue and having the baby puts them at risk. Ban late term abortion.

+3

If a fetus is a person, and said person is about to be aborted, then let this person stand and tell us not to abort him. Otherwise, the fetus is part of the mother, and as such, it's the mother's choice.

-2

man I love to dna test criminals, it works so well, don't you agree?

^ yeah, just ask O.J. Simpson

madDog, the OP means that Ron Paul supposedly supports individual choice, but he wants the government to legislate on moral issues.

+1

"supports individual choice" does not necessarily mean that you can necessarily do whatever you want to people, now does it? Should you have the right to murder people? Should you have the right to rob the bank? Should you have the right to mug old ladies?

"Should you have the right to murder people? Should you have the right to rob the bank? Should you have the right to mug old ladies?" read up on political philosophy: libertarianism adheres to the liberal school of philosophy (liberterianism = neoliberalism), thus all of those three intricate issues are NOT moral issues - they are property issues. Murder is desecration of property. Robbing a bank is theft of property. Mugging is theft of property.

Ron Paul is just for freedom overall. When he says he is personally opposed to certain things he tends to always say "Let the states decide". While I admire his willing to not force his views on people, his policies are so utterly loose it will make the USA uncoordinated and "out of whack", so to speak. He will turn us from the United States of America to the Incoherent States of America.

By the way if anyone wants my opinion on abortion I'm an undecided fence-sitter; it creates a moral dilemma for me. Though if a strong wind were to blow parallel to say fence, I'd fall on the Pro-Choice side.

human cells > Crack Hores who can't keep their legs crossed.

-1

kill babies.

abortion isnt the biggest issue facing this nation. its a wedge issue used to keep people distracted and divided.

+21

Agreed. This is a measly nothing issue compared to the monstrous issues such as the federal reserve, the role of the United Nations, taxes and spending, habeus corpus, the war on drugs, the bill of rights, the constitution, rule of law, I could go on.

+4

The legality (or lack of it) of abortion is far more likely to affect the average person than the nebulous issues you list. I doubt a pregnant teenager cares too much about the United Nations or habeas corpus for terrorists.

+2

How about habeus corpus for activists? Habeus corpus for environmentalists? Or habeus corpus for civil libertarians? Another thing is that Ron Paul is most offended by third trimester abortion. If you think that it is okay to have a baby for 6 months, but then decide to have an abortion, there is something wrong with you. Third, Ron Paul proposes to only prosecute the doctor, not the mother. Fourth, he is a federalist, meaning that he would only remove Roe Vs. Wade, but not directly outlaw abortion.

+1

And you think those other issues are nebulous? Well then you are simply uneducated. The Federal Reserve bails out the banks, at everyone else's expense. This hurts the economy. The average Joe's money is worth less. The price of gasoline goes up. You don't think this affects everybody? How about the fact that so much of our economy changes when the price of oil goes up? Have you not noticed that the price of EVERYTHING goes up when the price of oil goes up? And I'm just getting started here.

+1

maddogsol, do you know what happened when the Fed didn’t bail out failing banks? It has nothing to do with what money is “worth”. Gas…are you f*cking kidding me. Repeat after me, the Fed has nothing to do with the cost of a barrel of oil. There is no man behind the curtain arbitrarily raising prices on poor stupid joe. You got a major gripe about gas, call the Chinese and Indian embassies and explain to them how they shouldn’t industrialize anymore because it inconveniences joe.

+2

DIE CHRISTAN DIE

Habeas corpus has not been suspended for U.S. citizens (unlike in the Civil War) so I don't know what you are talking about. I agree with a lot of Ron Paul's positions, I voted for him as a libertarian way back when, but the reality is legalizing drugs or getting rid of taxes isn't going to happen, but getting rid of abortion rights might, which makes him dangerous. BTW 3d trimester abortions are already illegal.

+1

Wrong civiliansam. If the Feds did not bail out banks, the banks would make more careful decisions, rather than be careless with credit, which is what gets them into trouble in the first place. If banks go under, it is their stupid faults. Bailing the banks out increases the money supply, which is the cause of inflation. Any financial publication could tell you this.

Also, when inflation goes up, things become more expensive. This is not even investment banker level knowledge, more like 7th grade level knowledge. Various financial publications have reported the value of the dollar going down and the price of gasoline going up.

+2

The Fed bails out the banks by creating money out of thin air. It has been proven on various occasions.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/12/23/cccrisis123.xml (that's one link out of many I could post)

http://tinyurl.com/2aqbsg

if you want to see high gas prices, try isolationism. Guess what would have happened if Saddam Hussein had been allowed to keep Kuwait, or worse yet invaded Saudi Arabia.

+1

Dr. Paul doesn't advocate isolationism

-2

Libertarians do. Is he a libertarian or not?

+2

Libertarians are the most insincere douchebags on the planet. They scream about freedom, but what most of them mean by freedom is freedom from having to pay taxes and assume any kind of social responsibility. They really just want to protect their own financial freedom while denying to others the opportunity to attain their own.

-3

Hes what you call "True Conservative." He actually promotes real conservative values, not this bullsh*t Big Government no freedom constant war in places we don't belong Corporate *ss kissing Neo-Liberal Sludge Bucket that the conservative party has become.

+1

"Dr. Paul doesn't advocate isolationism" "Libertarians do. Is he a libertarian or not?" You're wrong. Isolationism is when you prevent foreigners from coming to your nation, prevent trade, cut the nation off economically from other nations. Ron Paul and the Libertarians advocate the exact opposite. Wikipedia is your friend.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolationism (first couple paragraphs answers all your questions)

pages on Wikipedia can be written by anyone. It really isn't a reliable source of information. Much like the comments page on a YTMND

Really? According to this study: http://www.news.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html , Wikipedia is as accurate as Encyclopedia Britannica.

+1

doesn't say much for the Encyclopedia Britannica, now does it?

Oh, you mean that it is put together by HUMAN BEINGS, and not extraterrestrial angels who never make mistakes?

What I'm saying is that your point of view is very simple and narrow-minded if you put so much faith in stupid internet articles like the one you just posted. Anything with a sub-topic, "according to a study" should NOT be taken to heart. According to a study, intelligence is directly related to shoe size.

-1

All I'm saying is that Ron Paul is not an advocate of isolationism. That is a slur created by his opponents, who do everything they can to ridicule him like rabid 12 year olds.

Well, maybe not all his opponents. Maybe just dirty teeth trolls like Rudy.

to all the people above... our situation surrounding inflation is the best it has ever been. The Fed is doing great keeping the inflation rate at a managable level so that there is less unanticipated inflation and investors can feel safe putting their money into stocks and bank accounts. What we need to worry about now is the budget deficit... the US is going bankrupt.

-1

You are correct about government spending. 100%. But I don't think I can really agree with you about inflation. You ought to take into consideration that there is the officially reported number, and that there is something more important, namely, the relative prices of commodities, imported goods and foreign currencies in relation to the dollar. You should also remember that the government has a vested interest in presenting the inflation rate as favorable, because they are held accountable.

RON PAUL FTW

+3

It's going to be Ron Paul vs. Obama. I say Obama just because you know something f*cked up will happen when a black president is on duty.

It's never happened before. How would you know?

Watch this movie about our monetary system and be educated as to why the corporations we work for are becoming increasingly ruthless. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279

-1

LoL, live in mom's basement much?

-3

…says the banker

+2

ILLUMINATI ZIONISTS NEW WORLD ORDER FREEMASONS 9/11 DENVER AIRPORT PARANOIA PARANOIA PARANOIA PARANOIA PARANOIA PARANOIA PARANOIA PARANOIA NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO NWO

+1

^ Did you even watch the damn thing?

Oh f*ck, Ron Paul has infiltrated YTMND! NOOOOOOO

"YTMND is a site created for the purpose of furthering the creativity of its users. It stems from an idea that, using sound, and image, and some text, the users can convey a point, funny, POLITICAL, or otherwise, to the general media. "

-1

we dont need liberty, we need EPIC FREEDOM

+3

http://tropicalfreedom.ytmnd.com/ - PACARD '08

+1

You need to show us YTMND's that don't suck.

-1

you're a f*cking crackpot. you need to stop jerking off to a candidate that no real person, except a bunch of fat, ultra-republican internet-basement dwellers is gonna vote for. i could talk about the political issues and sh*t, but that's unfunny and doesn't belong on ytmnd.

+2

Only a few fat basement dwellers? You are such an idiot. Ron Paul has won multitudes of straw polls, has more money donors than anyone else (and more money for that matter), has the largest audiences in Iowa and New Hampshire and now beats 'big shots' on certain traditional polls across the country. Do yourself a favor and actually learn about the people you criticize. But even if this were not all true, I stick by my principles, and vote for people who best represent my views.

-2

"he has more money donors than anyone else" (and more money for that matter) - that sure says a lot about whose interests hes taking into account. and i dont even disagree with a lot of what he says. reducing taxes is great and his foreign policy is too. but i cant back someone whose trying to overturn roe v. wade, because that just sends me the message that his social views are pretty backwards. ok fatty?

+3

First of all, I can run 5 miles non-stop, as well as do 30 pushups and 100 situps. How many can you do? I bet I can run circles around you. You don't know jack about me. Second, not only does Ron Paul have the most donors, as well as the most serious supporters, but he reportedly has the most diverse crowds of supporters. Thousands of people of every race, creed, religion, age group, occupation support him. Unlike you, they don't listen to the idiotic smears of Michael Medved.

-3

Finally, I don't entirely agree with him about Roe V. Wade either. In every other possible way, though he is one of the most civil libertarian politicians in our nation's history. Outside of abortion, only the ACLU can hope to compare to Ron Paul's civil libertarian track record. So no, he is most certainly NOT Pat Robertson.

-1

i bet you made that up to prove my wrong. lying on the internet proves youre real life is terrible and bleak. also see the ED article on internet tough guys lol.

+1

btw i can tear a horse in half and idk who michael medved is

+1

When you make a claim about a person you never met, THAT is a lie. You end up making yourself looking like a jerk. Besides, I can prove my claims. I will even private message you where my real name comes up with google results. Namely, road races/street runs, even marathons

-2

"and idk who michael medved is" Doesn't change the fact that you rely on cheap insults, because you can't string together a real argument.

-1

or that im f*cking trolling and i didnt even watch the ytmnd but i think how worked up people get over RNO PUAL IS FUNNYY

+2

"Oh, I'm just a troll. Ha ha, just kidding" is the excuse of people who get their *ss handed to them.

-1

BECAUSE COMMENTS ABOUT PACARD AND ALL CAPS SHOULD BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY

+2

very seriously.

no

+2

I am gonna vote for him. :D

+1

ron paul is growing on me

a fungus is growing on me

+5

F*CK YEAH, INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ERA POVERTY AND NO FORIEGN RELATIONS! Seriously though, i like half his ideals, and the other half is impossible to achieve in the state this country is in now.

+1

NO

+3

If you vote for ron paul your voting for old men to have sex with little boys(NMBLA)......................hairy balls

-1

Boy am I glad that he said he won't run as a 3rd party if he doesn't get the Republican nod. We'd have a bunch of morons voting for him, which would just be giving Hillary a half vote.

+1

I don’t know how anyone could disagree with this man’s views unless they truly are imperialists who think that America should police the world while its people are taxed to death under a crumbling dollar. However, I do agree with what someone said above, ytmnd isn’t exactly the best stage for this… too many kiddies who couldn’t care less about freedom. I am definitely voting for Ron Paul and so should every other sane individual who cares about their liberties.

Yes, you are right, people tend not to care about freedom until they turn 15 or so...

+3

imperialists are awesome man. there those cool british dudes with monacles who got rich off the darkies' labor lol

+2

Ron Paul for the win.

-2

I'm voting for Ron Paul and so should you :)

at least the dude tells the truth.

That's what all the Bush supporters used to say...doesn't mean much.

Yeah, I don't want pot and all those other mind-f*cking drugs legalized, you want that kind of sh*t? Go move to ansterdam you stupid pot head I'd rather go with Hillary

-3

Hillary = Democrat woman version of Bush.

DIAMOND & PEARLS FOR ALL YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa

^ just VOTE for me, pleeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAASSSSEEEEEEEEEEE?

POTUS? No, thanks. Secretary of State? Right on.

-2

From http://www.facebook.com/ronpaul "Like the Founding Fathers, the core of my political philosophy is grounded in the knowledge that rights come from the Creator, not the government. Since rights do not come from the gov't, the gov't cannot violate those rights. Religion has a very important role to play in a limited gov't philosophy." Enjoy your theocracy, f*cktards.

-2

A theocracy is when religion is forced upon you. Libertarianism is the exact opposite of theocracy. Even communism has more in common with theocracy, as they force you to have NO religion.

+2

He's a libertarian moron. He believes everybody is born with rights that cannot be infringed upon. The government is here to serve the people, NOT the other way around.

-2

To be fair not all communists hate religion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_communism (Yeah, I know, it's like mixing Cancer and AIDS)

Communism is actually rooted in early christianity and catholocism.

Vote for Gordon Freeman and G-Man in 2008.

+8

getting rid of the FBI and CIA? what a great idea! ...not. :P

-2

You Paultards make me sick. And he's my representative, too...having met the man, I know he's a nice guy who means well. He's done a great job in our district. But the effect of his policies on a federal level would result in a confederacy of sovereign states...and since a system of FEDERALISM has been present and effective since the framing of the Constitution, that would be a serious problem. Breaking the system under the guise of "liberty" is not a proper method of bringing about change.

-2

No worries, he's a constitutionalist AND a federalist, as well as a libertarian

Presidents Jefferson and Jackson both advocated state's rights and individual freedom, they were anti-federalists, and they were both amazingly successful and well-liked.

+2

Real libertarians are pro-choice

+3

Chuft, find me a candidate that you agree with 100%

-1

I agree with adolf hitler. 99% the 1% was that I thought he shold have built bigger ovens.

-3

^ no one asked

There should be a confederacy of sovereign states. Why do you think they're called 'states', and not 'provinces'? 'State' implies sovereign. Everything within a state's border should be controlled by the state only. Anything between states or outside the nation should be dealt with by the federal government.

In response to chuft's comment: In reality, Libertarians are fairly torn on that issue. It's somewhat of a dilemma for them.

Ron Paul said that shopping mall security guards were doing a better job fighting terrorists than U.S. Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan. hes a douche http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFhaH-6QLi4

-2

Is it his fault for telling the truth?

LETS FIGHT THEEM OVR THRE SO WE DNT HAVE TO FEGHT THEM OVR THEER LOLOLOLOLOLOL Though seriously. You fail it. America isn't really fighting terrorists over there. they only make up about 5% of iraq's combatants.

Hes right, actually. U.S. Marines COULD do a better job, but they aren't since they were sent to Iraq and, as rylasasin said, only a small mount of Iraq's combatants are actually directly linked to Al Qaeda. It's the same logic as attacking China in response to Pearl Harbor in World War II.

^ Bush and Cheney make Douglas MacArthur look credible.

Uh now that I understand your comment we -didn't- actually uh attack China in World War II...it is an example.

When did I say that? Oh, that's right. I didn't. Douglas MacArthur THREATENED to invade China, but never actually went through with it, because Harry Truman stopped him. By the way, this was during the KOREAN war.

Hmm...

The preteen mentality dominates the majority of these comments. Paul in 08.

lol rupaul suckxorz

-2

Ron Paul supporters are getting so annoying, the thought of how hard he's going to lose in the primaries brings a smile to my face.

+2

Ron Paul George and Ringo

+2

I'm voting Ron Paul, he sure as hell is better than any of the others...

+2

i am voting for him too. but he is not going to win.

he is an interesting candidate, but there is a lot about him I don't like

-1

Agreed for the most part.

Gay.

+1

Ron Paul, in his own words: Regardless of what the media tell us, most white Americans are not going to believe that they are at fault for what blacks have done to cities across America. The professional blacks may have cowed the elites, but good sense survives at the grass roots. Many more are going to have difficultly avoiding the belief that our country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists -- and they can be identified by the color of their skin.

+2

This conclusion may not be entirely fair, but it is, for many, entirely unavoidable. Indeed, it is shocking to consider the uniformity of opinion among blacks in this country. Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty, and the end of welfare and affirmative action.... Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the "criminal justice system,"

I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. If similar in-depth studies were conducted in other major cities, who doubts that similar results would be produced? We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings, and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers. Perhaps the L.A. experience should not be surprising. The riots, burning,

looting, and murders are only a continuation of 30 years of racial politics.The looting in L.A. was the welfare state without the voting booth. The elite have sent one message to black America for 30 years: you are entitled to something for nothing. That's what blacks got on the streets of L.A. for three days in April. Only they didn't ask their Congressmen to arrange the transfer.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/15/124912/740

He speaks the truth. Start listening to honest black advocates, like Bill Cosby and Thomas Sowell. Stop listening to hucksters and charlatans like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

-1

The only way for black people to succeed is to stop waiting for politicians to do everything, and start taking responsibility for their lives.

-1

I'll put Larry Elder in the same crowd as Cosby and Sowell. An independent thinker and a wise man.

-2

I do enjoy Larry Elder. I think he provides a very interesting set of views.

-2

If I gave a damn what some n*gg*rs thought I would whip them and tell them what to say.

^ If you ran into a real black man, you would get a boot up your ass, followed by a dick

+2

madDogSol- If the American Left wasn't concerned with increasing the self-sufficiently of the Black population, as Ronny seems to point out, then why do they put a particular focus on education of impoverished minorities. I doubt Ron's plan to cut off all federal involvement in our education system, in the name of his concept of small gov't, is doing minorities any favors.

-1

And you are welcome to assert any straw man argument against welfare percipients or those to advocate maintaining welfare programs, but when it comes to welfare families I think that anybody with a lick of humanity would agree that children should not be punished for coming out of the wrong vagina. Oh, and a majority of people on welfare are actually employed BTW, but don't let that little fact get in the way of writing them off as bums.

-1

Based on what I have seen, the left does not seem interested in making the black people self sufficient at all. Upon examining the actual results, it seems as though they are really just interested in endlessly giving them more and more government pork at the taxpayers expense. That makes as much sense as your parents telling you that you should live in their house forever, but then say that they want you to be independent. The Democrats are just trying to buy votes from the Black community.

To make matters worse, around election time, they go to the black neighborhoods, then blame the white people for their problems. But the truth is, that white people have little to do with causing troubles. All the average white person is interested in doing is going to work, go shopping at Wal-Mart, grabbing some cheeseburgers on the way home, watching some football, then let the wife watch American Idol. That's it. But when one is running for office, desperately looking for votes, facts don't matter.

To be a politician, one just HAS to have a bad guy to blame. For the Sharptons and the Jacksons, it is the white people. It is Don Imus. It is some wealthy lacrosse players. It is some white kids down south. Whatever. There needs to be a villain to get people all riled up about. These alleged helpers are really parasites.

Yes!

F*ck off.

5 even though you didn't cite my site: http://clearlythebestcandidate.ytmnd.com/

-1

ron paul is fail

Poor grammar is bigger fail

+1

It's YTMND.. jesus christ.

+1

HAIL RON

-1

This ron paul fad is the biggest scam since religion. I'm gonna laugh my *ss off when he doesn't even get the nomination.

-2

Scam? You care to back that up or are you just talking out of your ass?

+2

RON CRUISE

We all know he's going to lose.. just shut up.

def.

-1

I say... F*CK RON PAUL. And f*ck all asshat politicians. 1'd for faith the lunatic fringe of a corrupt system filled with idiots. Also c*cks.

-1

Fun Fact: people like you are the easiest to control

Just a big ron paul ad. Weak. I can't wait for McDonalds ads to be stuck up there. Vote Ronald McDonald 08!

+2

Grimace for VP!

+1

http://mcdonald2008.ytmnd.com/ lol

I hope we have someone like W in 2008 I lOVE HIM!. Your civil liberties are useless when your dead. I think the government should be allowed to randomly search anyone they want. If you have nothing to hide you don't need to worry.

-4

That's what Hitler said

then kooter is not a "he"

Joejew has lots of money to hide because he is a jew kike thats only cares about money and screwing people. Just like the rest of the jews

-3

Kooter- How is it that an anti-Semite, like yourself, is defending W, one of the biggest supporters of Israel? Understand the dynamics of foreign policy much?

If anyone cannot tell by now that Kooter is a f*cking troll, then I am extremely saddened by the state of this website. And can anyone tell me why conservative, homophobic, theocratic neo-cons would support Israel, the only country in the middle east that supports homosexual rights and has full freedom of religion? OH RIGHT JEZUS™ BIBUL™ PROPHESEEZ™

+1

No, the NeoCons only use the evangelicals and fundamentalists.

Its our duty to win the New Crusade War. I am HAPPY we bombed iraq I wish we move on to the other muzzie contries and then take the holy land back from those filthy kikes.

-4

Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution. I don't vote for anyone who is that stupid.

+2

Hear hear, the voice of science!

+1

Yes he does, you idiot.

No he really doesn't.

"The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good"

-2

Besides, this hysterical insult is really a form of anti-christian bigotry.

-1

Why does this country always get f*cked up presidents and f*cked up candidates? Can someone please explain this to me?

For the reasons Schoulayer states v

-1

no use peddling politics here. ytmnd is like an elementary school, except with no teachers to discipline kids when they draw penises on the walls.

+4

:(

+2

It was amusing the first time around.

the greatest countries in the world are not in any way libertarian

That is not because of any problem with libertarian philosophy. The 1st world nations of the world have large governments. It's the nature of government to expand and never to give anything back. Now that the government has taken over the airline industry, it will never be in private hands again. Now that the supreme court has decided the government can seize land from people without their consent, it will never be overturned. Over several hundred years you can see how we went from a near libertarian

prosperous society to what we're currently at - packs of people voting together for government handouts. 'The greatest nations'... what a joke