hell yes

-11 [show comment][hide comment]

if google ron paul..... if you google ron paul...

-15 [show comment][hide comment]

the republican party is gonna need a lot more money than this to win the next election

-12 [show comment][hide comment]

Ron Paul is great and all, but this is YTMND not f*cking Youtube. Go preach where somebody gives a sh*t and until then shove a fat f*cking dildo in your *ss and swivel.

-11 [show comment][hide comment]

hell no, fail

Leave it to Wizzletoff to f*ck up YTMND with this UNFUNNY political garbage. WE NEED MORE HILLARY EATING FEATUSES AND BARROCK EATING CHICKEN. RON PAUL SUCKS. also c*cks. 1'nd

+22

LOL...................... NARV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

"using sound, and image, and some text, the users can convey a point, funny, POLITICAL, or otherwise, to the general media." http://ytmnd.com/info/about

+14

Fred Thompson for president...

-14 [show comment][hide comment]

I'm not voting at all, unless it's a 1 for this site

+11

a balanced budget? never raise taxes?? he doesnt understand economics! hes just like all the other candidates!

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

i support ron paul

+4

So, Ron Paul for president, and Dennis Kucinich for vice president?

+1

He seems good?

+6

Man, nothing will un-NARV this site. Not even cheesy music.

-1

A "FAIR" Tax is not the sales tax you support. It would be very unfair to the poor and middle class. Massive fraud would occur as people would buy and sell "under the table" to avoid the 23-30% tax rate that would have to be imposed. If you give a tax break to one group, you have to make it up elsewhere. That leaves it to the middle class and the poor

what is dis? END TEH IRS???? WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO (liek teh whistles lol)

-3

I like what Ron Paul stands for - but if your in love with everything a politician has to say than prepared to be disappointed.

+7

By posting this on YTMND you're appealing to a group composed mostly of non-voting aged idiots. You'll be lucky if 200 of the people who look at this vote for anybody.

+3

-1

Not as good as me... but close.

-15 [show comment][hide comment]

we need more weed smoking conservatives in office

-3

Yeah, we need a f*cking *ssh*le who thinks its our fault terrorists want to kill everyone in office. F*ck this guy.

-8 [show comment][hide comment]

Americans need Ron Paul. Someone who actually follows the constitution and wants to get rid of the IRS. This man is something else. 5 for the Revolution.

Does anyone else find it funny that Ron Paul and his supporters are against financial dependence on China yet advocated buying markers from WALMART to write on their cars. Irony 5/5.

+3

If he was really that great, he wouldn't have to be spammed online.

-2

If he was really that bad, he WOULDNT be spammed online.

+16

He's hitting voters that are very much taken for granted, he's utilizing the internet which is something candidates don't try to do enough. He's got my vote anyway.

+11

he doesnt have the campaigning money so he uses the webternets

+5

rofl, no kidding

No. He's hitting voters that are idiots. Yes, its great to crusade for the first amendment , but people need to realize that everything else this douche thinks is wrong. 1. Putting relationships with every other country on hold is a HORRIBLE idea. We need to get the support of other countries again. 2. How can you be for separation of church and state but against gay marriage? 3. Libraries, schools and fire-stations are all socialized. So don't give me bullsh*t about not socializing medicine Ron.

TheKremlin. Yeah... That´s subtle.

+2

90% of voters are idiots. They just vote cause they can.

actually ron paul is one of the only candidates who isnt attached to puppet strings, the only reason the main candidates ARE main candidates is becuz of the press they get which is controlled by the ppl who pull their strings, anyone who believes that ron paul doesnt have a chance or just isnt as good as the others is brainwashed by channels like fox news, in reality he is better

+6

Yeah, but his points still suck so it doesn't matter how popular he is.

-5

Oppose the UN? Are you f*cking serious?

-18 [show comment][hide comment]

we can only hope and dream he will

+15

What he said

+11

F*ck those stupid UN f*ggots and their non-binding resolutions.

+10

The UN is a major threat to our freedoms and national sovernty

+11

The UN is a congregation of c*cksucking f*ggots.

+4

UN = UNITED N*GG*RS :D

+4

the un opposed the war on iraq

+7

The UN is UN-American

-3

Paul is a dipsh*t for his comments at the debate but he's got the right idea about the UN and IRS, not to mention homeland security and the department of education. The UN is the most worthless organization and has accomplished nothing except writeing a few angry letters to countries who tell them to f*ck off, oh they gave some food to needy countries. also c*cks.

-12 [show comment][hide comment]

The UN doesn't give anything to anyone, it has no power, the individual countries that compose it do. If we give food/water money to the UN, they distribute it to needy countries and take all of the credit. We need to stop funding the UN because it is a direct threat to our freedoms. All it takes is one retarded president to dissolve the United States, don't think it can't happen, look at what's going on in Europe.

+8

And what is it that's happening here?

+1

We have a retarded president who seems to be trying his best to dissolve the southern border; the only reason Canadian-U.S. border security is never discussed is because it doesn't exist

-1

really? US - Canadian border security doesn't exist? then what the hell am I doing when I sit in line for 3 hours trying to cross the border from Detroit to Windsor? Why was my car searched both leaving and entering the US? Who are those people that look like police officers that I talked about the reason for my visit, told where I lived, and showed my passport to?

+2

lol, political debate on the internet

+1

You're doing it wrong

-1

the UN was a horrible idea, we should go back to the old days of balance of power politics, the days of Bismarck.

+1

heck yeah

+3

bill cosby

+18

pokemon

-2

LEEEEEROYYYYYYYYYYYY JENKINS

God dman I hate you ron paul spammers

+1

+1 for the worst music I've ever heard, +3 for the best man for the job.

-1

Worst?! This music is epics, like the Medicare D coverage gap.

Protect the borders. Kill the terrorists. Punch the Hippies.

+24

Dude, you need to go into jingo writing. Your seriously f*cking gifted.

-9 [show comment][hide comment]

Thanks, I'll take that literally.

+9

Koolaider is my hero

+9

rofl, punch teh hippies

+4

You forgot Nuke the Whales

+7

I meant it literally. I have no time for making sarcastic remarks on the internet.

you forgot poland

FRED THOMPSON FTW!!!

-2

i'm voting for koolaider

+4

I will vote for any man with two first names. Except Larry Craig.

+16

Jon Carrie?

+8

Girls' names don't count. Especially if they're Poland forgotters.

+10

Ricky Bobby!

-7

Jon Stewart for president.

Anybody else reminded of Razor Gator?

+15

Razor gator was funny and awesome unlike this

+2

88, baby!

Well actually, he forgot Poland.

+2

I hope we can get a prez that brings back segregation. Kill the n*gg*rs. The best n*gg*r is a dead n*gg*r.

-6 [show comment][hide comment]

LOL BLACK JOKE GIMMICK OMFG SO FUNNY ALERT TEH INTARWEBZ LOL

+1

wooooooo

Holy sh*t, am I the only one who thought this was a complete f*cking joke?? LOL. I mean, the campaign promises are so ridiculous, it made me laugh out loud. And I'm sure we really want ghetto "vote for blah blah" written in the back of our car. Yeah, that's a real professional message. Well, still laughed my *ss off on this. 5 for you!

+2

I thought the same as Motile, the only thing I could think of while reading this is: "Uh, and how do you plan to do all this? You kind of need taxes for these sorts of things."

It should be Vote 5 for Ron Paul in 08 That way, when he loses, he can blame the downvoters

Vote for Obama.

-1

http://barackpresident.ytmnd.com

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

Write-in George Bush.

-6 [show comment][hide comment]

Beans and Cornbread!

Corns and Beanspread!

-2

O-bomb

ITS AN E-BAUM!!!

Why would I vote for someone who promises to take my guns away?

+1

Vote for RoboCop. He'll oppose big corporations and make awesome police.

+33

how exactly does RoboCop "make awesome police?" wait, don't answer that.

He's f*cking RoboCop.

he is racist, look some stuff up.

-11 [show comment][hide comment]

No, he's not. There was a person writing articles for his newsletter that ended up being a moron.

racist?? make this site NSFW right away!

+2

Ron Paul is not racist

*ssh*le ron paul 2008

-2

paul is not racist

thats whats so crazy about it

+1

How about hell no, we ain't doing that. I don't trust a man who's supposed to stand for personal liberties but supports the Defense of Marriage Act and who gets glowing reviews from the likes of David Duke.

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

you´re a f*g

+3

He's said before that, despite the fact that he doesn't agree with gay marriage, he sees no constitutional reason to oppose it.

And libertarians are just a bunch of whiny idiots who don't want to pay taxes. Pigs.

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

Some are like that. But there's merit to the tax resister movement. The middle class is overtaxed in America. The FairTax, basically a national sales tax on everything but food and clothing, is a good idea supported by a lot of libertarians.

-2 [show comment][hide comment]

you're an idiot. look up the specific taxes he opposes you retard. he is not opposed to all taxes. he is opposed to the Fed. HUGE f*ckin difference tardcake.

+1

Libertarians believe in a freedom, giving us our own money back is preferable to giving it to the government. The government fails at pretty much everything it does. Get rid of social security, get rid of welfare, get rid of all this wasteful spending and give our money back.

+9

We should be up in arms with the amount of taxes that we pay. Not only do we pay sales taxes, state income taxes, federal taxes, ownership taxes, death taxes, ect (the list goes on)... but even all of that isn't enough to satisfy our government. Our government ends up borrowing billions from the federal reserve which prints this stuff at will. Resulting in inflation, yet another indirect tax on us. Why do we borrow money from the fed reserve when we can print it ourselves?

+3

If we got rid of the income tax and massive cut tax spending, the remaining taxes would be collected mostly through sales taxes. We'd save additional money getting rid of the IRS and ATF.

+2

we'd spend less money and have less taxes if congress didnt involve themselves in every little affair. Theyre overwhelmed and dont focus on major issues. If the national government let the states govern themselves for once we wouldnt have near the amount of tax issues we have now, regardless of the party in office.

+2

Yeah, I hate the idea of having fire and police protection, a functioning infrastructure, clean water, roads, access to health care, security in retirement. Down with all taxes!

-4

libertarians are just anarchists who don't have the balls to admit it.

-4 [show comment][hide comment]

^^^^ Those things aren't funded by Federal taxes ^^^^

+4

Libertarians believe in small government, anarchists believe in no government, there is a big difference.

"Yeah, I hate the idea of having fire and police protection, a functioning infrastructure, clean water, roads, access to health care, security in retirement. Down with all taxes!" Libertarians aren't against all taxes, way to get dramatic though, 5 stars. You would have all of those things you listed above with only a fraction of the money we pay in taxes currently. Most of your tax money is wastefully spent, libertarians are for shrinking government not abolishing it.

+3

lol, political debate on the internet

He's discussing abolishing or greatly diminishing federal taxes you dolt; stop misreading posts. State and local taxes would largely still be in place.

"if you gargle Ron Paul"? Don't his supporters do that every day? :D

+1

HA HA HA HA HA OMFG HAHA HA HAHARHR FGHARBVARGBARBL HA HA HAAHHRHARHAB ARHAHN FDDF SFUFS:H BHAAHAHHA FGUFJC IOJMG SH*T SHA BHAHHAHSH BHARHHGGGGG BAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAWAARRRHARRRHARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAHRHAHRHHHARHHBHARH BOSFDJGBARGHGHL>>>*COUGH*

+1

Yes, I routinely gargle the semen of my preferred political leaders... it's called DEMOCRACY. If you don't like it GTFO.

+1

goddam thats catchy

That song is f*cking sh*t.

+2

Ron Paul or the anti-christ. That should be his f*ckin slogan. Anyone against him sides with Satan.

-3

RON PAUL 2008, MAKE AMERICA FREE AGAIN

+4

ron paul is a f*cking idiot.

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

it's not like he's a doctor or anything...

+7

He doesn't have a chance in hell of winning

-3 [show comment][hide comment]

All you Ron Paulians need to be banned.

-4 [show comment][hide comment]

I heard he would legalize weed too or something... or maybe it was someone else?

+1

Or was it mike gravel?

+4

Ron Paul would, maybe Mike Gravel would too

+3

No.

-6 [show comment][hide comment]

Yes.

+1

If he wins the primary I'll vote for him!

+4

yeah... even though i'm mostly a democrat, I'd much rather vote for him instead of that insane bitch hilary any day.

+4

IL DUCE FOR PRESIDENT

+3

YTMND is for art, not advertisement. We have the front page for that. Also, your crazy f*ck candidate wants to privatize everything and destroy all income taxes. The right likes to criticize the left on all sorts of things like their environmental policies because they ravage the U.S. infrastructure, but then they 180 and support guys like Ron Paul. This guy has the typical neocon view of leaving abortion and same-sex marriage to the states. He thinks the Constitution is replete with references to God.

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

I get it! Since you see yourself as "on the left," everyone who disagrees with you is "on the right" and wrong by default! That's a convenient way to think!

+6

Economicallly, libertarians are on the right. Ostensibly, libertarians are on the left on social issues, but Ron Paul has been a cheerleader for the Defense of Marriage Act. So I'd say he hit the nail on the head.

-2

No, he didn't. Dividing every political position into the nebulous blobs of "right" and "left" is ridiculous and meaningless. What is the "right's" position on interventionism? Well, the Bush administration is obviously very much for it, but many classical conservatives are against it. Oh, but they're in the Republican party, so they're on the right, SO THEY ARE THE ENEMY BY DEFAULT? Don't rationally consider any position, but immediately dismiss it because it's on the "right.

+4

Getting rid of the income tax would be the best imaginable. The income tax was really the beginning of 'big government.' Anything that shrinks government from it's current abominable state is a positive thing.

+1

Way to pull a strawman out of your ass. I never argued that everyone who disagrees with me is "on the right". I stated a generalization of attacks on the left wing by the right wing. Does that mean everyone does it? No. That's why it's called a generalization; you're supposed to lose meaning to an extent and assume that your audience has the capacity to make inferences.

-8 [show comment][hide comment]

I stated that he has a typical neoconservative view about abortion and same-sex marriage, and that's not incorrect. This is where he diverges from libertarians. When CaribDevist tried to correct you on that note, you went on with irrelevant blather about nebulous polarization. You're the one dragging emphasis to that, not me.

-7

I didn't sh*t all over Ron Paul because he's running as a Republican. You just assumed I did because, based on your strawman, you probably don't have an actual argument. Pretty pathetic ad hominem there.

-10 [show comment][hide comment]

ron paul does not have a typical view of gay marriage. he believes it is a state's right issue, as you receive marriage licences from your state's gov't. He doesn't want the federal gov't to force states to recognize civil unions from other states. I don't totally agree with him on this but it's not as simple as "gay marriage is bad" which you are trying to pin on him. As to abortion, many libertarians are pro-life as they believe the fetus has the right to live and should be protected.

+4

I will amend one thing I said: neocons don't really prefer leaving same-sex marriage to the states, since "neocon" is basically another word for Bush yes-men among the dwindling 20% remaining. Neoconservatives would federally ban same-sex marriage outright, whereas social conservatives would leave the issue to the states. This is one more socially progressive issue that should transcend individual states, like civil rights for blacks.

-9

There are 1100 federal statutes that use the term "marriage" so it is far too ingrained in U.S. legislation to leave it up to the states. That's my view, at least. You're free to disagree, but I don't think Ron Paul really cares for same-sex marriage considering his idea that there's a war on religion. All I ask is that people avoid trusting seemingly nice guys like Ron Paul and Obama simply because of their appearance. Checking their actual views and voting records is essential.

-7

I have no problem with early term abortion, late term abortion is no different than murder. Why would a woman forgo early term abortion and wait until the baby's brain begins to develop? It boggles the mind. Later term abortion can and should be an option if the womans health is at risk or if she was for some reason unable/restricted from getting an early term abortion - Ron Paul is not anywhere close to being a Neo-Con

-2

Not a neocon? He proposed a constitutional amendment to eliminate birthright citizenship (H.J. Res 42). Now why would Ron Paul want to throw away a constitutional system that's worked for over 200 years? Additionally, he gave the only nay vote on H.R. 180, which would have restricted Congress from signing contracts with businesses that fund the destabilizing militia in Darfur. In fact, the legislation would have empowered states by authorizing them to divest from contracts they hold with these

-5

businesses right now. The only reason he opposes this is because he thinks only voluntary action on the businesses' part would accomplish anything. His justification had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the U.S. DOES NOT want to fund genocide. It's like he doesn't realize that neoclassical economics isn't the end-all solution to all worldly problems.

-6

His position on deportation of illegals is murky too. He sometimes says that widespread deportation is unrealistic yet he also says that he would actively deport all people who overstay their visas or break some other immigration law. As for abortion, your view of what type of abortion is murder is subjective and while I agree with you on the practicality of when to get an abortion, it should not be our right to handle how someone else handles their body if they are mentally able.

-5

STFU

+3

Heaven forbid someone make substantive points rather than blindly following the man with the nice smile.

-1

"Not a neocon? He proposed a constitutional amendment to eliminate birthright citizenship (H.J. Res 42). " You don't seem educated on what neo conservatism is. A number of the neo cons wan't to push amnesty and rid borders for a North American Union like George Bush. Almost none of them are tough on illegal immigration. Whatever the case; immigration isn't even strictly defined in the definition of neo conservatism. It's so absolutely ridiculous to call Ron Paul one.

+3

You're right. I threw away the meaning of neoconservatism in that series of posts just to further bash Ron Paul, because I can't stand all the jizz flying around here about this guy. I do know that neoconservatives aren't tough on immigration, since businesses depend on them, but they don't give a sh*t about Latinos just the same. He shares a few neocon sentiments, but for the most part, he is indeed his very own precious kind of nut. I apologize for the neocon part.

-3

Regardless, I don't understand why despite all of the genuine points I made against this guy, people just place a bunch of negative ratings on these posts without justification. I haven't negged a single post here, because I support discourse on the topic rather than try to hide the parts I don't like. So that's the end of my tirade. I'd rather learn about things in earnest than preach to these dimwits (not you). I appreciate your correction, and I'm done with this site.

-1

Best. Lie. Ever.

Typical Ron Paul fanboys. They downvote ANYTHING that they don't agree with or shows a negative side of Paul. Then they say "Oh no we aren't censoring you - we are the ones that get censored."

+1

Want to know how many times the Constitution actually mentions "God"? Hint: It's an integer in between -1 and 1. This guy thinks that there's a war against religion. Is he batsh*t insane? Hell yes. Should you vote for him? No. Does it matter? Not really, he's not going to get the nomination anyway. To put it shortly: WRONG.

-3

Want to know how many times the Constitution actually mentions "God"? Hint: It's an integer in between -1 and 1. This guy thinks that there's a war against religion. Is he batsh*t insane? Hell yes. Should you vote for him? No. Does it matter? Not really, he's not going to get the nomination anyway. To put it shortly: WRONG.

-6 [show comment][hide comment]

Either he meant "god" figuratively (referring to the spirituality and religious freedom our founding fathers advocated) or he's trying to appeal to the huge % of Christians that comprise the American population. If you think about it, drawing the Christian voters by any means necessary may be the only way to defeat another "Bush" type politician from being re-elected. It's probably worth overlooking the mistake in light of all the significant changes Ron Paul supports.

Though I get the impression that those of you spamming this have never actually sided with Ron Paul's campaign in the first place.

who votes? gay.

+1

true

-1

Want to know how many times the Constitution actually mentions "God"? Hint: It's an integer in between -1 and 1. This guy thinks that there's a war against religion. Is he batsh*t insane? Hell yes. Should you vote for him? No. Does it matter? Not really, he's not going to get the nomination anyway. To put it shortly: WRONG.

-8 [show comment][hide comment]

Why are you featured? Your sites are worse than mine are.

Don't forget Pauland. Vote for Ron Paul.

+2

Want to know how many times the Constitution actually mentions "God"? Hint: It's an integer in between -1 and 1. This guy thinks that there's a war against religion. Is he batsh*t insane? Hell yes. Should you vote for him? No. Does it matter? Not really, he's not going to get the nomination anyway. To put it shortly: WRONG.

-13 [show comment][hide comment]

Want to know how many times the Constitution actually mentions "God"? Hint: It's an integer in between -1 and 1. This guy thinks that there's a war against religion. Is he batsh*t insane? Hell yes. Should you vote for him? No. Does it matter? Not really, he's not going to get the nomination anyway. To put it shortly: WRONG.

-12 [show comment][hide comment]

Want to know how many times the Constitution actually mentions "God"? Hint: It's an integer in between -1 and 1. This guy thinks that there's a war against religion. Is he batsh*t insane? Hell yes. Should you vote for him? No. Does it matter? Not really, he's not going to get the nomination anyway. To put it shortly: WRONG.

-11 [show comment][hide comment]

Well, he's the best candidate running for the Republicans. That's sort of like being the thinnest kid at Fat Camp, though.

Or the most moderate person in the Nazi party.

-2

He's running on the republican side because it's the only way he'll stand a chance. People always vote republican or democrat, in truth he's a libertarian. Also, Hillary is far worse than any republican canidate. She'd probably expand government toward socialism even more than it is now.

+2

dont say that or he'll get kicked out. He'sa republican until he gets elected, THEN hes libertarian

-1

"Hillary is far worse than any republican canidate." I don't know if Hillary is worse than Tancredo. Or Romney.

+1

Ron Paul FTW!!

Ron paul is the only one who can save our souls from damnation

-1

Ru Paul is the only one who can save your soulds from damnation

This country is dying. if you can't see that, then you can't see why we need Ron Paul.

you sure do need Ru Paul! http://rupaul4prez.ytmnd.com/

-2

RON PAUL!!! RON PAUL!!!

ron paul over that negro filth obama anyday. or worse, hilary clinton.

-3

RON PAUL FTW!!!!!!!!

+2

vote for ron!

+2

the only guy running who isnt a retard, and also happens to be a genius

+3

Ron Paul sucks.

-7

i am

+2

Ron Paul '08!

+1

HELL YEAH!

+1

I usually do not like ytmnd's like this, but every now and then we can take 1 site and let it be serious. There are hundreds of thousands of others. I would like to abolish the IRS as well.

+4

lolbertarians. yeah, infrastructure sucks. riiiight.

-6

You seem to enjoy strawmen though.

+2

maybe, but I don't feel like writing a paragraph trashing a candidate who has absolutely no chance of winning his nomination.

-2

There are 1100 federal statutes that use the term "marriage" so it is far too ingrained in U.S. legislation to leave it up to the states. That's my view, at least. You're free to disagree, but I don't think Ron Paul really cares for same-sex marriage considering his idea that there's a war on religion.

-3

BETTER THAN VOTING FOR A FAT C*NT NAMED HILLARY

+7

VOTE OBAMA BITCHES!!!! oh yea, this image is shooped... doesnt isist.

-10 [show comment][hide comment]

i got the image from the official ron paul website

+5

RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!

+5

He's got my vote!

+3

Protecting privacy? Getting rid of the National ID card? Stopping needless 'Police Actions'? Focusing on ending America's finacial bankruptcy? I may not be on the ball for ending birthright citizenship, but those other things sound pretty good. I'm preferring Edwards right now, because he sounds very Libertarian. But it's too early in the race.

+3

nothing wrong with libertarian

+4

Ron Paul=5

+1

I'm fairly neutral when it comes to politics (weird eh?) but this Ron Paul guy reminds me of old-school republicans. Arguably, the best kind. Although there is one thing I am not sure about. If he plans to oppose trade acts like NAFTA (sorry my knowledge of the others is sub par), won't that hurt both the US and it's neighboring countries?

+1

No. While I'm all for trade agreements, these locale-based trade unions gradually increase their powers and subvert the rights of their member governments. The result is an overlord government completely (as opposed to mostly) controlled by special interests, where the citizens had no say in the creation of said government. Think along the lines of the EU.

Voted against the PATRIOT act, and he's a Republican? He'll be disowned by his party, and be doomed to failure. Not that I don't want Republicans to fail...

-4

Wait a minute... you mean this isn't a joke? LOL at all the serious comments on this thread.

-2

I'll give this a sponsorship bump

-1

Libertarians= selfish *ssh*les. You know what happens when you put people who hate government in charge of the government? Sh*t like hurrican katrina. Good luck topping 5% in any primary idiots.

-1

fvck you too

police state loving little b!tch no one made those morans to live on the coast below sea level in the historic path of hurricanes, but a populist beaurocratic govt. continues to subsidize stupidity read plato's republic sometime

Yоu fuсking рussy. I'm gonna lick your bаlls and sniff your аsshоle.

"police state loving little b!tch no one made those morans to live on the coast below sea level in the historic path of hurricanes, but a populist beaurocratic govt. continues to subsidize stupidity read plato's republic sometime" Sweet, run a campaign on that platform.

+1

Government, no matter what size, will allways be corrupt. It will always be a monopoly in anything it does. If you really care about the poor, and the needy, support aboloshing the IRS and government handouts, and support your local private charities who do far more for our nations needy than any government ever could.

+3

I hate to break it to you, but private businesses on the scale needed to serve a modern country will always be corrupt. Competition and classical liberalism look great in theory, but are totally inadequate in practice.

-1

Also, do you want to know why all this online buzz surrounding Ron Paul will never translate into votes on election day? Mounting a serious campaign requires a nationwide grassroots network of volunteers. Ron Paul and his supporters are driven by a philosophy which at its heart seeks to protect people's right to be as selfish as possible. I don't see too many volunteers being created by this movement.The furthest people will "volunteer" for paul will be digging up a story or 5ing a ytmnd.Good luck with gotv

-1

There is nothing selfish about opposing big government. Libertarians have the intelligence and foresight to see what happens when you give government too much power. At the moment we're heading toward communism is small graduated steps. Freedom is always the best choice, for everybody, rich and poor. It is better to be poor here in the United States than to live in ANY communist country in this world. Social programs fail for obvious reasons and big governments always crave POWER at the expense of ppl.

-1

The difference in corrupted private businesses and corrupted governments is that the businesses can't have you arrested, have you audited, or any other way to control your life. When people stop buying from a business, the business loses all its power.

"It is better to be poor here in the United States than to live in ANY communist country in this world." Have you ever seen or read The Grapes of Wrath?

You mean the book about a depression brought on by government intervention into the private economy, describing life for poor people over 50 years ago? Or is there some new Grapes of Wrath out that describes our millions of impoverished americans who avg 2 cars and 3 TVs per household?

+1

I'm there, donated, bumper stickered and did I mention voting in the NH primary?

+3

He's delivered over 4000 babies.

+3

thanks for the donation ;)

+3

He seems to support only "common sense" platforms. America will never vote someone like that into office. Reality sucks.

-1

HE IS THE F*CKING MAN

So good to see the maturity of the libertarian/Ron Paul thought police! Good job repping the campaign guys! Keep voting down dissent!

-4

Or we could just take the neocon route and simply censor all the opinions that we don't agree with...

-2

That is what you are doing seary - thus the "voting down dissent" comment. Plus Ron Paul votes like a neo-con. Look at his record on civil unions, abortion, medical issues, etc. If it clucks like a duck and walks like a duck then its a ....?

(sg1) The only reason I am responding human-like is because you acted with some degree of tact. I can resect that. I can't remotely agree with your assertion here, though, that "voting" (by proxy a free democratic process) is even comparable to media censorship of public opinion (ala fox news).

-1

You have my axe. and my bow

+1

And my Staff

-1

Taxes Taxes Taxes. You average republican. Only caring about money. If my taxes help the country I don't mind paying them. The UN may be pretty ineffective but it's needed to keep the world in touch and working together on some of the smaller things.

-3

Do you really understand where your tax money is going? Most of it isn't 'helping' anything - a great deal of your tax money is simply -unaccounted- for. Plenty of it is going into the money sink that is Iraq which we were never meant to win. Many of the social programs that are designed to help people are being abused, you are paying for people who are too lazy to work, as is the case for the majority of welfare recipients.

-1

Taxes like the Income Tax don't go to anything that will benefit you or your fellow americans. Somewhere along the way we forgot about "No taxation without representation."

Do you like it when your taxes pay for $9 dollar screws? How about $100 dollar hammers? Bet you like those 'Bridges To Nowhere' too. And this society JUST CAN'T survive without buildings named after Robert Byrd. My God, the nation would collapse. And where would we be without our warehouses filled with stale government cheese? Haliburton is awesome!

-1

And I've got to agree. This guy is all "me me me". He stands for selfishness.

He stands for freedom, not selfishness. Opposing the government does not make you selfish, despite what you may have been brainwashed to believe.

-1

...because government is not the only solution to social problems. Government social programs always end up creating a culture of people who abuse the programs and get money for nothing. The original population the programs were created for becomes the vast minority of those who actually use the program. Welfare is a prime example of this, it was growing at an amazing rate before welfare reform. Unfortunately welfare reform is not permanent and after it passes we'll be back in the sh*t.

-1

You got a problem with "me me me"? If it weren't for "me me me", you wouldn't be on this website. In fact, there would be NO website. There would be no internet. There wouldn't even be any f*cking personal computers. You wouldn't have been able to make that post. There wouldn't even be a goddam telephone. You would be talking to your friends through a string attached to two tin cans. Besides, the people who are in line for welfare instead of busting their butt and getting a job stand for selfishness

we borrow $3 billion from china every day to support our overseas operations. If we brought our troops back home, we wouldn't need to pay income tax . Plus income tax is illegal and is a voluntary system. The country used to function perfectly without an income tax because evrything we need to supoprt the country is taxed elsewhere. Most of the money from income tax goes to the black budget.

-2

My goodness, it seems like a couple of people who downvoted your post seem to want to continue living in their fantasy land where nothing goes wrong.

-1

Anyone who voted less than 5 on this is proving that they in fact are at a minimum mildly retarded; also that they are not deserving of life in what used to be a great country before bush f*cked it up, or maybe they should just die all together.

-1

Maybe they'd rather live in a socialist over-controlling police state. Most of the candidates are in favor of passing laws that further reduce individual rights, while Ron Paul seems to be the only one who opposes them. Hillary, Obama, and Guliani all oppose the individual right to bear arms, but can't really do it outright. They'll start with registration of all firearms, further restrictions on what's legal and not legal, and slowly whittle us down to muzzle loading rifles...

...and after that, we'll lose the right to modern inline muzzleloaders. Gun making may become a cottage industry, I recently built my own 1911 from castings, and there's nothing keeping anyone else from doing the same.

He's not about himself, he's about the people, watch some of his videos on You Tube, you will see exactly what I am talking about.

-3

Holy sh*t...Watch videos on youtube. That's some research numbnuts. How about doing actually research before you post propaganda. Stop watching Fox and go visit a part of the world that the Republican ideal has devastated. ALSO - They say anything to get you to vote, and live up to nothing. That goes for the Dem party too.

"Will" is a pretty lofty word, when you consider that the government runs on checks, balances, the free will of others.

+1

Ron Paul has delivered over 4000 babies. Ron Paul has seen over 4000 vaginas. Vote Ron Paul.

+8