One because of horrible innacuracy. You suggest atoms formed of their own will from nothing and propogated like an embryo. The proper explanation would involve the big bang by your story.

everybody knows it was the FSM

RAmen

/agree with storms

Reminds me of Douglas Adams.

NOT EVEN INTELLIGENT DESIGN CAN SAVE YOU FROM ME.

agreed: the beginning is inaccurate, i'm not sure what that is referring to, to be honest, regardless, the point is made well

Meh, might as well five it for being unique.

This site needs more Jesus.

-1

Wow, i guess now i guess i worship something when i say i worship nothing, but if i worship nothing how can i be worshiping something?

+2

Lol, if only.... f*cking Christians.

THIS IS WHAT SCIENTOLIGSTS REALLY BELIEVE. jk, 5.

You should have saved your $7.47 you spent to sponosor this. Go preach on a street corner where you can reach a lot more people who don't want to hear it.

+2 for funky music -10 for religious rambling

Horrible inaccuracy and great omissions. You didn't use your brain even a bit. For example, you excluded the possibilty of different life forms with different natural 'constants'. You also exclude the possibilty of more than one sources of creation. Or even the possibility that is 'intelligent' as WE know it. Very very narrow minded half-assed presentation of some half-assed philosophical discussions. You TRULY fail.

^^ the possibility that the source of all creation is 'intelligent' or aware of us as we know it*

And btw, most importantly, you didn't show any proof of existence (I mean ACTUAL PHYSICAL PROOF) for your intelligent designer (IF we assume 'he' is only '1' and exclude ALL other uninvestigated and as gibberish possibilities.)

-4 for religious propaganda

WOW! you're awful.

=( you fail!

Liked it, glad I can like something and not just be a mindless collection of atoms...

Wheres your god now? 1'd!

i'll give a 5, just by chance

When you stop asking questions about the world around you, you stop finding answers. At least scientists dare to guess and work out the answers and make mistakes instead of remaining happy and ignorant. Were it not for science this message wouldn't be broadcast to millions of people around the world through fibre tubes via light (YES TUBES PEOPLE!).

http://exploitsofgod.ytmnd.com/

That's idiotic. Biggest waste of money ever. You see... I have this theory that science is devoted to the pursuit of knowledge, whereas religion is devoted to the rejection of knowledge- Rather than try to explain why and how things happen, the religious just pan everything they don't know off to some big invisible person floating in the sky. It makes no sense at all.

I am highly amused at how offended everyone is.

It really is hysterical how offended and preachy all these downvoters are. Notice the subtle irony here.

Don't dumb everything down by saying that it happened "purely by chance". Evolution isn't "purely chance", dumbf*ck.

sigh

wtf is this relgious sh*t, gtfo outta my internets f*gggggggggggggggggg p.s. your gonna have to take gr.11 biology again with fuller, and he wets the bed

So who designed your "perfect God"...an even more intelligent designer? 1 for pushing logical fallacies on YTMND.

If intelligent life can only arise on planets that are suited for it, you might imagine that any life that does arise will always say "wow, isn't it amazing that everything works is suited so well for us to live here?" I like the music tho.

5 for production value, -4 for knowing absolutely jack-sh*t about the big bang, accretion, abiogenesis, evolution, geology, and the fallacy of infinite regression. =D

5forthe SOMETHING FROM NOTHING part. that's the real question. the question of luck is abstruse, irrelevant, and counter productive. to all the angry downvoters: are you sure that you don't worship the scientific method? that perhaps you are no less closed minded than religious fundamentalists? don't get me wrong, religious crusades on science anger me. but so does atheist bigotry in the name of science. no theory or data set can possibly explain how it's possible that anything exists in the first place.

+5 for the music and for all of the hilarious reactions in the comments.

It is well put together and the music is good but i have given it a 1 because i hate to think that there will be people who will read it and thing omg there must be a god. This is so in acurate it makes my eyes hurt.

1 because while the random events that caused life are pretty hard to believe, so is the idea that an invisible sky man just existed and always existed and nobody created him, you creationist dumbass.

I'll 5 this, favourite it and donate to it if you answer this to my satisfaction: Why can "God" just exist without being created, but the universe can't just exist and had to be created?

HOW DARE YOU PUT CHILD PORN ON YTMND!

tightenupthegraphics, i don't think the ytmnd is saying necessarily that there is a god, it's simply being humorous about asking the questions, and perhaps suggesting that we have a little humility and imagine that maybe we all have no idea what we're talking about. and then laugh about it because we're hilarious morons.

f*ck you, you christian piece of sh*t die in a fire and stop trying to shove your idiotic nonsense down everyone's throat

1 for thinking that evolution involves some type of choice or decision and thus completely misunderstanding it.

Although the ability for one to prove there is a God lies in everyting around this universe, people sometimes fail to realize that proving the existence of god does not constitute the exsistence of a christian god. Intellegent design, no matter who argues it, does not prove in anyway the validity of the bible. Its like proving ice cream is tasty, and proving that chocolate ice cream is the best, its two different arguments. Nice site though.

^_^

Lowlz at bitter atheists.

-1 for not funny, -1 for religious BS, and -2 for sponsoring your own ytmnd.

I think nearly all voters here 'down or up' have upper-average to high levels of IQ unlike the creator of this site. Now what we must realize is that there is still no SOLID PHYSICAL EVIDENCE or PROOF to DESCRIBE the source of all existence and first amounts of energy in the universe (nobody knows it's name, it's rules, descisions, likes and dislikes or whether it's more than '1' entity.) So stop all this religious non-sense.

Also, [that source of creation] may not be intelligent in the sense we know it. And besides WHO THE HELL can ever prove that with different natural constant there would be no universe or life in the universe? I'd say there would be, but completely DIFFERENT with different living beings and natural laws! I challenge you to prove me wrong! >:)

www.divinecosmos.com

I want to 3 this, because I resent the whole 1 = disagree/5 = agree dichotomy, but really, it's not very good. How's a 2 sound?

TightenUpTheGraphics "Why can "God" just exist without being created, but the universe can't just exist and had to be created?" Because the Universe is not God. Because God is God then God would have the attributes of being God. One of those attributes is being eternal and also being the creator of all things, including time itself, putting God outside the dimension of time altogether. Why should matter exist?

Why should the dimension of time exist? Only explanation is that something with eternal attributes had to create it, something that isn't bound by time itself, God. Same thing goes for matter. Matter cannon not be creater nor destroyed right? If this is true then there is nothing in this universe that can create more matter, which means something that is not made of matter had to make matter.

or maybe the whole universe we live in is just a molecule in a donut that is beeing eaten atm by homer simpson! that makes the donut factory god, and hes purpose was just to satisfy homer :(

Also, dont give the universe is eternal and so is matter argument cuz if the universe is eternal then now could never happen. That would mean that there would be an infinite amount of time before now, making now, impossible to happen, but it is happening, right now. The only explanation is that time is not eternal and that it was created. But even if it was eternal, still don't explain why matter and time exist.

-100,005 for lack of science, +100,005 for taking a risk. -4 for risking turning ytmnd.com in to a religious debating ground. There's to much of that on the internets already. Science FTW, wishful thinking FTL.

wow now that turned everyones belief because it goes into such detail and fact. Not.

uh, are you serious? birds decided to turn into animals? unreal

Th greates part about this is that people have alot to say. You (the offended) have to realize what his literal aim was. On a backdrop, I find it hilarious you found the need to counter your thoughts. Keep it coming, this is how our Super-powers keep dignity at bay.

5

also god

good stuff

You crazy atheists and your idea on creation. God bless yeh' all. CHRISTIANS LOL

Mehm.

Keep your damned ideas to yourself and off of YTMND, you should've known you were going to get downvoted to hell by hordes of Christians. Oh and BTW your theory is bullocks. Something can't happen from nothing.

you've been spending too much time with Raptor Jesus. your logic sucks and your comprehension of evolution is a mere Operating Thetan Level 0.1. also, moron.

this ytmnd seems to be more parodious than some might have originally thought. Otherwise, it would have been a big crock of pseudointellectual tripe. lets hope not.

You obviously missed my point, if God is God, then He has the attributes of God, unlike anything in the universe which means that God is eternal and outside the dimensions of time, and space. Since God is not bound by any specific dimension we can say that the physical science of this universe is not bound to Him...

dewarmysniper: this isn't my view of evolution/creationism

"if God is God, then He has the attributes of God, unlike anything in the universe which means that God is eternal and outside the dimensions of time, and space." What? The god knows where it is because it knows where it isn't....

Jesus thinks the internetz are the debil!

"What? The god knows where it is because it knows where it isn't...." OK, is that an argument? cuz if so it has no relevance to anything were talking about

What's your point?

"in the biggining there was nothing" EXCEPT. my friend: CHUCK NORRIS.

Awesome. These guys are the most close minded people I have ever met. My priest knew the man's son who created the Big Bang Theory, and he said that his father believed in God. God does not prove himself to keep arrogant *ssholes who don't have faith out of heaven. You can not prove religon, the whole point of religon is faith.

Trying to discredit a theory of the formation of the world based on chance? Not the best argument. Last I checked the Universe was pretty damn big, and has existed for a long -ass time. Odds are not a factor.

HORRIBLY innacurate. In actuality, looking at things through such a childish lens garauntees poor understanding of the actual principles at work. Nothing 'just happens', everything is the sum of what proceded it. Also, 'time is simply an observation of energy being expressed. Therefore time exists because of the properties of energy. Also, the universe is eternal arguement is not invalidated by your silly 'infinite time' arguement, because a state of action (present) is necessary for energy expression.

Also, if you believe god exists outside of existence, then you just admitted you think god doesn't exist. Existence = within the scope of things that can exist due to the natural laws of the universe. If it's not within those boundaries, it doesn't exist. Pretty black and white.

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Leviticus 20:13 It's cool that God made the universe and all, too bad he REALLY hates gays.

Ok, I like your argument against TightenUp's comment, however, by putting god outside the realm of our exsistence seems to put him into a dietist's conception of god. If I'm not mistaken, your argument entails that God created matter, but the rules of matter do not apply to him because he is not of matter. It, and correct me if I'm wrong, puts two completely different dimensions upon the universe, a dimension that I don't feel fits the biblical description of God at all.

That is not how ANYTHING works or was made

but its still funny

Original and thought-provoking.

I like how I could tell exactly what you were preaching on the second paragraph (Just by chance -HE- found he had the ability to do this).

Drusamson. Let me give you an example. The word "the". It exists inside the english language, but it doesn't exist in sign language. IF your deaf, and sign language is all you know, then does that mean the word the, in the english language doens't exist since you have no experince or knowledge of it? Elaborate on the not fitting hte biblical description of God at all. I think this fits the description perfectly. "I am the alpha and the omega, the beginning and end."

By the way, religion requires faith cause it is fake, just like people beleive that a missile hit the World Trade Center, or people beleive they are the superior race. But unlike religion, they have evidence. I would beleive that black people are inferior before I would ever beleive in God, at least there is proof.

Damn kid, look up super string theory and energy matter conversions. There you will find a working explanation of the universe that goes as far back as before the "nothing" and explains how matter can be created

there is proof, God proves Himself to you as you seek Him. That's why it is a faith thing because you have to trust that God will reveal Himself to you. When I first started believing in God I had my doubts just like you but I wanted to know the truth. You can never understand it until God individually speaks to you. Aside from that however, i've seen way to many things for me to NOT believe in God.

"The word "the". It exists inside the english language, but---" Language's existence is conceptual. As is god's. It is not my way to preach, however you lack a fundamental understanding of the universe. Simply put- Ideas/concepts can exist without mutual knowledge between peers, but this is in no way physical existence. The human imagination is not limited by the rules of existence, only by the structure of the mind. Concepts don't follow the rules of physical existence.

5 for reminding me of that one time i became one with god thru lsd :D

ok before i said i 5d it for the something from nothing idea. what i should have said was the something INSTEAD of nothing idea, which i found implicit in the ending when it says 'they went on trying to discover how no one got a hold of nothing and made everything'. i 5d it because that statement is humanity in a funny nutshell.

Basically, by comparing god to the english word 'the', you state that god is a concept, and therefore does not exist in the scope of the physical universe. And if he doesn't, then he doesn't exist as an entity that can have any effect on the universe except through beings that act on that idea. And that's where you get religion. A bunch of people following an idea that someone made up a long time ago :)

Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

^stephen hawking quote^

TheMadMonkey: I could go aheead and refute your argument but instead ill just say this. Your intelligence blocks out your basic common sense.

I agree with the statement: everything is a product of what preceeded it. Believing that we were just "created" is like believing your new car just appeared at the lot. In actuality, it was built in a factory using metals, rubbers, and other things. Where did these metals come from? They were forged from ore. Where did this ore come from? It was dug up from the crust of our planet... you see where I'm going here, everything has a source. We have simply not discovered our source... In reality, I don't think

we ever will. Once we do, we'll have the answers to all our questions. The laws of matter apply to us just as much as they do to said car... we're not above it in any way... we have to come from somewhere, we were not just created.

Peterguy, God 'spoke' to you when you were looking for answers? If I were you I would get my self checked for paranoid schizophrenia!

Well, everyone's entitled to their opinion, and I don't hold grudges. We all invariably think what we think because of what we have seen, and how we have seen it. What exactly do you mean by my common sense, though? That I don't trust my instincts? Well, if that is the case then yes, I don't trust them, because they are a survival tool, great for when you lack knowledge, but not effective when you have it.

First off, the not knowing something exists but it still does argument can work for anything, including what your disspelling here. See how many people are bringing up Super String Theory and things of the like? To them you are deaf, and lacking knowledge of the word "the". However, the two levels of existence you put forth in your argument go against the biblical explanation because, if I am understanding you correctly, you are saying that matter and God are two different things.

If you put that barrier between them, then it makes no sense that God, who is not bound by the same laws of matter, can appear as matter itself in the books of Genesis, Ezekiel, Exodus, so on and so forth. I leave Jesus out of that mix purposely because he was bound by the laws of matter. If I am completely misunderstanding you, please clarify sir.

And also, these arguments are unnecessary. The problem is, you talk about your 'god' without bringing us any description. That's like me saying 'Oh I know a meteor hit the earth a 1000 years ago' without bringing any sort of date/proof/evidence. No one can prove me wrong but I can't prove myself right! That's when you know I'm talking out of my -ass! If you want people to accept your argument of god existing, bring us some ACTUAL PHYSICAL OBSERVABLE evidence (the ones that made YOU a believer!)

Otherwise, check to see if your logic is still in place! We can't prove god not existing, but we can't prove him existing without ACTUALY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE!

Drusamson: God is spiritual and physical and beyond description, so yes God is not matter. He can take the form of matter if He chooses but He is not actual matter. That is my belief.