It's not your place to say

+1

UP VOTING LOLZ

+1

Quite creative. You win 4 internets!

+1

FIVED! Agreed

I give this a 1 for TOO FAST =/

Lol 1 and 5 all the way f*ggot. lololol

Hmm, you kinda screwed yourself their as far as this sites ratings go

Lacks humor.

Hahahaha that did make me laugh so i will give you a 5

I don't think i've ever given anybody a two.

mod fav

mod faved defeated the downvoters OUCH

1- lacks humor

-2

5'd because your sister is delicious

please make this slower

Yes! Good criteria.

way 2 go!

Lovely, I can find no other way to properly bait the downvoters. Remember to delete your 50 alts fat kids! Your doom is nigh when the hall of shame is built!

Agreed.

not very funny, but very true.

Site ratings SHOULD be objective, but they never ever are. Case in point: sycophants flooding in as soon as max makes this a mod favorite

I've faved this site. You can't tell what I've voted!! Unless......

I like this...especially because WoW ytmnds automatically get a 1 from me. I dont f*cking want to see a random screenshot of an orc in a field. I dont give a sh*t.

then i give you a 3 according to your own standards

it's funny how everyone's giving you crap for 'lacks humor' when one of your five-able criteria includes being thought provokative. DOWNVOTERS FAIL

I'm not really sure whether I should give this a rating, but I'll say this: I hope your message gets across. There's way too many people with a "5 for Syncan/1 for Inkdrinker" mentality. We have 2, 3 and 4 star ratings for a reason, dammit.

Lacks humor, and I don't see any sources sited.

-2

A Must for Every Idiotic Downvoter!

Also for other stupid people, the point of GOOD & GREAT, not stupid and pointless, WoW YTMNDs are for the audio, not the visual... *sigh*...

I'll give you a 3

freekowt, I cited the music source and I made the visual, what's the problem?

What do you mean "there are more than 2 ratings"? Last time I checked, I could only vote once.

More than two ratings means more than just 1 and 5.

4 because it's true

we all need this guide :P

3 shouldn't necessarily be your average vote. For example, I only look at sites with the most views or at the top of the list because I don't want to waste my time.

You are correct Liface.

+4 for education

well said

I DID NOT LAUGH LACKS HUMOR

-1

^Humor is only one criteria, this is an informational YTMND.

This man is a genius.

I liked, I know its not humors other then the (1 star to 5 stars) at the beginning... I'm still giving it a 5 because it so true. I have a recommendation. Even though FAV(orite)ing isn't voting, people have been abusing it. adding FAV to every site. wouldn't that be included their... its like a new up/down vote thing. in another sense?

Five for World of Warcraft.

5 because it's mah thang.

lol

-1

stfu

-1

Still haven't gotten the hang of it I guess.

-1

People need this YTMND. It's like the world of YTMND is black and white. or * and *****. We still have the other 3 ratings. Good work. 4 stars.

Following the rules that you made, this YTMND lacks humor.

-1

As criteria for a 5 was "makes you laugh," this is clearly worth a 3.

You got that one part wrong. You 1 when sources are cited and 5 when they are not. Makes it easier for EB.

-1

It doesn't have to meet EVERY criteria listed. I think about 2+ criteria makes it correct

Thank you for including something about citing sources... That alone deserves atleast a 4.

1'd for the WoW comment. If votes are subjective and if people are supposed to vote based on THEIR opinion, then telling people how to vote based on YOUR opinion makes you a hypocrit and an idiot.

-1

go f*ck a level 62 dwarf f*ggot

Also judging by your criteria you should automatically get a 1 because this YTMND references WoW.

-1

^That was a joke, Moonkin, lighten up.

Barely useful info.

actualy your average vote depends on what cites you view, if you only look at top 5/ top 15/ u&c, it will be more like 4, but if you vot eon the recently created cites its more like a 2

Lex Luthor says... This site's WROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG!!! *Upvotes upvotes upvotes upvotes upvotes!*

FTW MC 900 ft. Jesus. FTL tehpwner2.

This site is somewhat original and attempts to cite its sources. I didn't smile or laugh though. 3'd, therefore.

There are only two ratings.

-1

et tu, Minder. Clearly only celibate homos here. 5'd for words to live by.

f*ck cititng sources.

Cool. You should add as an INCORRECT usage of the 1 Star Vote to be: "You don't get it". ... Or add the Abstain Vote as an additional option.

it made me smile

There are only 57 ratings.

4'd, would be 5 if it was slower

4'd for the reasons listed in the guide

Looks like to me that Moonkin is someone who is absolutely OBSESSED with WoW, so don't take it too hard, MrRallentando. The rest of us got the joke.

"Use all ratings to help create a fair and balanced rating system" "fair and balanced" OMFG FOX NEWS IS TAKING OVER YTMND AHHHHHHHHH RUUUUN!

You referenced WoW, but I guess I'll let it slide.

-not very funny

Very good + original + thought-provoking = 5

This site inspired me to give it a 3.

there you go

Yes, I agree. More ratings then just 1 & 5.

3 for effort, but a few things... for one, you're implying that every YTMND has to be funny. I can like a YTMND but not find it funny (it can have sexy women or a cool image loop). The WoW citing is out of place and not very funny, so according to your guide, I should vote 2, and you don't cite the "For Dummies" book series, which I'm sure you used to make this site. However, all that being said, it's a genuine attempt to be informational if only flawed.

Tool.

DOWNVOTED

lol...

I must say that after reading the comments for this site, you get a good idea of the variety of people on the internets. Depending on who you are, you can see why. Oh well, at least we have this fantastic thing AT ALL RIGHT.

I'll be consulting this from time to time.

Lacks humor.

It's really not your place to tell everyone how to vote, but you make an effort at improving YTMND, and that gets points.

f*ck you Wracraft Hater!!!!!!

Combine your 4 and 5 together for the 4 rating, and say that a five should be one of the funniest things you've seen on the site. Also, I think that most fad derivatives should be 4 or below, and a scientology-related site has a vote system that starts at 3 instead of 1.

5 b/c max did

utilize my foot up ur *ss f*ggot! LOLLOOLOO!LO!OL

the balogna is in the nest, the pastrami is recyclable.

DID I DO THIS RIGHT>>

lol here's your 1!

It's...*checks list*...original.

I just realised something. Everyone that downvoted this is probably a an angry WoW fanatic who takes offence at your dismissal of what they consider to be the better part of life.

You referenced World of Warcraft.

This should be required reading for all YTMND users. Quiz will be given at end of class.

hmm all 1s or 5s!!!11one ROFLCOPTERS

To be honest, I'm just a rabid upvoter. I've convinced everyone I know who views this site to either upvote a site they like, or place no votes at all. I do this so that the average ratings of all sites will go up.

Have a 5 because the lame *ss down voters commenting are missing the point and making me laugh my *ss off.

stfu little bitch

i would say kill downvoters, who just becuase something has wow in it doesnt mean it cant be funny like chuck norris for example every thing that people use chuck norris with sux im not saying he sux im saying every retard that says hes awsome sux. that and the ytmnds suck.

Not good but not horrible.

you forgot file compression

3'd

lacks humor

asstastic, one'd

I obey my own standards.

Creative. Entertaining. But you didn't even make me start to grin. ONE.

I am very irritated by black-or-white voters. (And I'm proud to say that my average vote is 3.01 stars)

And I've got to say I'm impressed by all the commenters taking offense at your site. It's sort of a testimony to their lack of integrity.

LOL at the downvote comments

How about: Under 4 stars, put "Would-be 5 stars, but has some problem like synchronization." Will 5 when that happens. :D

Just kidding. 5.

Made on 4-20, Its the truth, I'm feeling nice, 5'd.

5 for the truth

true... but im still gonna only use 1 and 5. Thats just how i am

Your 5 criteria is far too easy. People should treat 4s like they normally do 5s. 5 should be reserved for the absolute best a site can get. But that will never happen.

i hope you were kidding about the world of warcraft thing... If you werent, you're a f*cking retard, you say dont 1 star for downvoting, and yet you 1 star because its a WoW ytmnd... /sigh

1 if a Warcraft ytmnd? Way to miss all the rest of your points, hypocrite.

Exactly... cite your sources people... you know who you are. 4'd for great knowledge!

I also auto-1 people who have no original ideas. Ex Googlefight, "____ is Emo", news site screenshots, and the inevitable "YTMND is down" screenshot.

Vote-nazi.

1 Because Humour should not always be considered when voting.

superbe

Amazing all the one's you got, the downvoters and high votingly challenged are offended.

1'd for saying we should downvote because of WoW.

5 Cookies for you good sir! Would you like some milk with that?

so according to your own rating system you get a 1

Not bad. Not good.

Five because I like you.

there is no "incorrect use" of voting. Vote however the f*ck you feel

I agree with all of the points. If something makes me smile, it get a four. If it's a lol situtation, 5. Stolen for 1. And nailing the rating system on the head: favorite.

this is one of those PTKFGS alternate universe things, right?

wow, a variety of ratings are in the comments too (those downvoters here are gay). anyways you need to add the 0 star vote, cos people tend to misunderstand that one.

Wow. It's like you read my mind. I'm sick of how most users vote as if 5 = good and 1 = bad and nothing in between. If you're going to give a good site a 5 then what are you going to give a truly great site. There's nowhere to go from there.

Not bad.

lacks humor

1'd

You did mention World of Warcraft...

Lacks Humar.

I LIKE THE AUTHOR

I personally found it humorous and appropriately paced. Extra points for MC 900 Ft Jesus!

what are you,some sort of ytmnd nazi?I'll vote however the f*ck i like

So voting 1 for downvoting is wrong...unless it's a WoW site, dipsh*t.

Alright, I just updated it. No more lame WoW joke for all those who didn't like it. Also added the no-vote. Thanks for all the feedback so far.

I don't really care about citing sources if it's obvious the creator made the pic himself.

shameless plug of a related site: http://ytmndvotingguide.ytmnd.com/

4 because a teacher's rubric made me smile.

+4 It's original and I got a chuckle out of it.

I don't understand it

I choose the 9th option: downvoting

meh.

4'd because it's how I try to vote... this isn't funny but as you say it doesn't actually need to be. If it has a clear message it's worth something.

This site goes under "Poorly made" and "Not funny" so according to YOUR guide I should give it a 1... lawl

sorry, only 1's and 5's

1 because you like anal.

Not bad.

ahhh....I "opt not to vote".

3 for average + 1 for MC 900 ft Jesus

its good info but the bass drives me crazy!

Aiming for a 3 average assumes most sites have moderate success at being funny. They don't.

ummmmmm did you just call me a dummy?

Ahh sh*t my finger slipped sorry dude.

Made me laugh. [:

Well, you cited sources. I tend to like U&Cs a lot. I shouldn't.

You should add "Adding a site to your list of Favorites does not affect that site's rating, and you can give any rating (from 1-5 stars) to any site, including your Favorites."

UPVOTED! PWNED!

upvoted! LOL I'M DOING IT WRONG!!!

according to your guyde, you would get a 3. But I have to 5 this b/c it needs to be said.

lacks humor

Now herein lies the dilemma...this is a solid three site, but that makes it far above average (especially lately) so does one give it an above average rating (as compared to the meh that's constantly being pumped out) or just stick with the the 3 it deserves...

I think for four you should say like "but misses that one perfect thing" or something.

the whole point of voting is that you get to go by your own standards

HAI THIS HAS NO HUMOR LOL

Great info... Everyone should know this in the first place and that's sad..

Also note that voters should NEVER advertise their own sites like this: thatsaspoiler.ytmnd.com/

So, this is a solid two.

1

Thank you very much for teaching me how to vote. By the way, your site meets the criteria for a 3.

upvoting!!!!!11!!11111one!!11!!

1'ed for great justice

You're not max... you have no say...

No, I'm not Max. But he favorited this because he thinks it is correct.

screw you and your rules

you forgot about the favorite/5-star combo vote... cockf*g -10

I go by my own standards. It's not your place to say.

Okay, citing sources is NOT important at ALL. YTMNDs are often funnier if the source of the sound or sometimes the image is unknown. It creates more buzz and mystery. Take orly for example. If I had known that the sound was just some random song about aquatic life, it wouldn't have been nearly as funny.

I'm not gonna lie. I fail at this pretty darn hard. (But this one deserves a 5!)

Ad hoc ratings are so much more fun.

you fail, please try again ^_^

Jesus

It's funny how the downvoters and the people crying about not needing a guide are the ones who need this guide the most.

upvoted

MORE THAN TWO RATINGS?!?!?!

below average without humor

also doesn't require much effort

Ha! I don't even like this site! f*ck you!!!!

Who died and made you king?

I'm pretty neutral on this subject

Maybe a bit too quick, but still quite well put together.

"3 for average + 1 for MC 900 ft Jesus" qft

incorrect use of 5: UPVOTED!

OMFG I DONT UNDERSTAND!! I SHALL CONSULT ADVERB!!

I guess this would be a 3 then.

makes me think of AdultSwim :P

Totally agree.

Actually, I rather liked it. Wish more people would do the same.

5 fo being smrt on teh internts!!1! *Mispelled Purposely

if I give nothing but 1 and 5, wouldnt the average be around a 3 anyway?

^I think you've missed the point. The average rating isn't it.

THANKS FOR THE GREENLIGHT TO ONE THIS f*ckIN SITE.

5'd for great justice. Too many people only vote 1 or 5 anymore.

Cool.

Not bad, original, kind of sounds like porn music muahahahahaha...

*claps* Very nice. You get a 5

Foiled by your own rating system.

Well, you're trying to teach ppl about voting, so... 4'd.

5

made me smile, or was that... something else?

also add infomative slideshows to the 1 list

I must say, your voting spread forms quite a bell curve.

^That's because I stick to my own formula. I have more 4's than 2's though because I mostly look at the up and coming, so the crappier ones are filtered out.

It's just a guide, and a good one. If it said "upvoters and downvoters suck" I would give it a lower score--as it is, it just states a solid and sucient opinion.

I saw this site ages ago. I somehow missed voting.

Agreed!

I'll just try to balance out my one's and five's instead. Sorry, but to get around an average of 3, I need to downvote you. :(

meh

5 for inspiration to start voting instead of just lurking

lol omg FAVED 55555555555555

I can count to potato

Some people call me a space cowboy

-1 for saying that not citing source is worth only 1 star

never mind -3 for saying that not citing source is worth only 1 star

Lord Fuzzywig approves and agrees.

There was a time...long ago... when citing sources was not an option. Some voters nowadays take this source citing crusade a bit far.

I never said that no sources automatically means 1. "A YTMND does not necessarily need to meet all criteria." Watch the whole thing next time before making a fool of yourself.

+1

I'm giving this a 1 because it wasn't funny, or original, and because under your system, 5's are way too easy to give and 1-2's are too easy to give, and additionally, to give something a 1 or a 5, requires different reasons than just degrees of humor. And of course, the goal of every ytmnd is not humor, so you get a 2, not a 1.

As for a lack of citing and theft: an automatic 1 for theft should be only given under really a strong sense that the poster is trying to claim it as its own. Using 1's to try and stop some clutter and copies is not going to work either. More like 1 star off the rating because there was no source or its a duplicate is more reasonable. It's hard to be sure, really.

Actually, this is not really that far off as I make it seem, I'm just criticizing bitter little points and ignoring the general intention and affect of the ytmnd. Since I am capable of dynamic introspective thoughts, I will have my gut reaction and intellectual appraisal have discourse and reassign a rating more distanced from my subjective point of view.

I appreciate your thought and consideration.

too bad 99% of people don't vote like this. Wish they would.

OMG I like this author!